PALL vs. IAC
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and IAC/InterActiveCorp (IAC).
PALL is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PALL or IAC.
Key characteristics
| PALL | IAC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -13.67% | -8.65% |
| 1Y Return | -34.15% | -7.54% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -31.80% | -34.40% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -7.54% | -0.77% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.00% | 12.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.99 | -0.30 |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.39% | 34.95% |
| Max Drawdown | -73.01% | -76.12% |
| Current Drawdown | -70.42% | -72.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PALL and IAC is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PALL vs. IAC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a -13.67% return, which is significantly lower than IAC's -8.65% return. Over the past 10 years, PALL has underperformed IAC with an annualized return of 1.00%, while IAC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PALL vs. IAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and IAC/InterActiveCorp (IAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PALL vs. IAC - Dividend Comparison
Neither PALL nor IAC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAC IAC/InterActiveCorp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 1.40% |
Drawdowns
PALL vs. IAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.01%, roughly equal to the maximum IAC drawdown of -76.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and IAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PALL vs. IAC - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to IAC/InterActiveCorp (IAC) at 7.16%. This indicates that PALL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.