PALL vs. IAC
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and IAC/InterActiveCorp (IAC).
PALL is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010.
Performance
PALL vs. IAC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PALL vs. IAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -7.34% | 74.07% | -17.38% | -38.77% | -6.28% | -23.26% | 25.27% | 53.94% | 17.23% | 55.73% |
IAC IAC/InterActiveCorp | 2.38% | 34.76% | -17.64% | 17.97% | -66.03% | 3.75% | 132.14% | 36.10% | 49.69% | 88.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly lower than IAC's 2.38% return. Over the past 10 years, PALL has underperformed IAC with an annualized return of 9.50%, while IAC has yielded a comparatively higher 19.34% annualized return.
PALL
- 1D
- 5.15%
- 1M
- -17.05%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 48.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -11.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
IAC
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 17.49%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.87%
- 5Y*
- -16.97%
- 10Y*
- 19.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PALL vs. IAC — Risk / Return Rank
PALL
IAC
PALL vs. IAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and IAC/InterActiveCorp (IAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALL | IAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 0.68 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.40 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 1.17 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 2.25 | +2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALL | IAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.68 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | -0.41 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.49 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.41 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between PALL and IAC is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PALL vs. IAC - Dividend Comparison
PALL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.67%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAC IAC/InterActiveCorp | 20.67% | 21.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.26% |
Drawdowns
PALL vs. IAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, roughly equal to the maximum IAC drawdown of -76.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and IAC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALL | IAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -76.60% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.17% | -24.36% | -9.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -76.15% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | -76.60% | +2.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.34% | -66.02% | +11.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.51% | -27.31% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.31% | 12.64% | -1.33% |
Volatility
PALL vs. IAC - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) has a higher volatility of 15.73% compared to IAC/InterActiveCorp (IAC) at 7.51%. This indicates that PALL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PALL | IAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.73% | 7.51% | +8.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.92% | 20.33% | +23.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.74% | 43.93% | +4.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.07% | 41.68% | +0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 39.79% | -2.08% |