PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PALC vs. SPMO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PALCSPMO
YTD Return27.13%47.91%
1Y Return36.76%57.54%
3Y Return (Ann)8.13%15.44%
Sharpe Ratio3.003.40
Sortino Ratio4.094.38
Omega Ratio1.541.61
Calmar Ratio4.314.57
Martin Ratio15.4419.03
Ulcer Index2.57%3.16%
Daily Std Dev13.22%17.69%
Max Drawdown-24.45%-30.95%
Current Drawdown-0.50%-0.33%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between PALC and SPMO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PALC vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PALC achieves a 27.13% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 47.91% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.57%
18.92%
PALC
SPMO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PALC vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
Expense ratio chart for PALC: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for SPMO: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PALC vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PALC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PALC, currently valued at 3.00, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PALC, currently valued at 4.09, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PALC, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.54
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PALC, currently valued at 4.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PALC, currently valued at 15.44, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.44
SPMO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SPMO, currently valued at 3.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SPMO, currently valued at 4.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.38
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SPMO, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.61
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SPMO, currently valued at 4.57, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.57
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SPMO, currently valued at 19.03, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0019.03

PALC vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALC Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALC and SPMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.00
3.40
PALC
SPMO

Dividends

PALC vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

PALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than SPMO's 0.44% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
PALC
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
0.82%0.74%1.69%0.64%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF
0.44%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Drawdowns

PALC vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALC drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALC and SPMO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.50%
-0.33%
PALC
SPMO

Volatility

PALC vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) is 4.08%, while Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that PALC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.08%
4.64%
PALC
SPMO