PAHC vs. WMT
PAHC (Phibro Animal Health Corporation) and WMT (Walmart Inc.) are both stocks. PAHC operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare), while WMT operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, PAHC returned 7.38%/yr vs 19.40%/yr for WMT. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PAHC vs. WMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAHC achieves a -15.51% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PAHC has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 7.38%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.40% annualized return.
PAHC
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- -15.51%
- 6M
- -16.36%
- 1Y
- 28.20%
- 3Y*
- 35.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.38%
WMT
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 7.04%
- 1Y
- 22.44%
- 3Y*
- 33.37%
- 5Y*
- 22.40%
- 10Y*
- 19.40%
PAHC vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAHC Phibro Animal Health Corporation | -15.51% | 80.76% | 86.30% | -10.42% | -32.33% | 7.28% | -20.09% | -21.31% | -3.00% | 15.75% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 7.24% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | 23.32% | 30.16% | -3.43% | 46.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAHC and WMT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2014 | 0.16 |
The correlation between PAHC and WMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.16 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PAHC:
$1.29B
WMT:
$951.88B
PAHC:
$2.33
WMT:
$2.88
PAHC:
13.47
WMT:
41.34
PAHC:
0.03
WMT:
2.70
PAHC:
0.85
WMT:
1.31
PAHC:
3.56
WMT:
10.09
PAHC:
$1.50B
WMT:
$725.31B
PAHC:
$488.12M
WMT:
$181.16B
PAHC:
$219.25M
WMT:
$44.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAHC vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank
PAHC
WMT
PAHC vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAHC | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.43 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | 4.25 | -2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAHC vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAHC drawdown since its inception was -79.62%, roughly equal to the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAHC and WMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAHC | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.62% | -77.14% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.13% | -15.75% | -36.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.13% | -21.93% | -30.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.63% | -25.74% | -39.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.62% | -25.74% | -53.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.14% | -11.33% | -35.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.01% | -14.63% | -24.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.81% | 5.30% | +12.51% |
Volatility
PAHC vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison
Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) has a higher volatility of 17.22% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 6.36%. This indicates that PAHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAHC | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.22% | 6.36% | +10.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.16% | 18.56% | +30.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.87% | 23.77% | +35.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.43% | 21.70% | +25.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.61% | 21.76% | +22.85% |
Dividends
PAHC vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison
PAHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than WMT's 0.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAHC Phibro Animal Health Corporation | 1.53% | 1.28% | 2.29% | 4.15% | 3.58% | 2.35% | 2.47% | 1.93% | 1.31% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.33% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.81% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Financials
PAHC vs. WMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phibro Animal Health Corporation and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PAHC vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison
PAHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phibro Animal Health Corporation reported a gross profit of 125.68M and revenue of 383.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.8%.
WMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
PAHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phibro Animal Health Corporation reported an operating income of 44.65M and revenue of 383.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
WMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
PAHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phibro Animal Health Corporation reported a net income of 24.02M and revenue of 383.54M, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.
WMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAHC and WMT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAHC has higher volatility (17.22%) compared to WMT (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAHC dropped -79.62% vs WMT's -77.14%.
WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAHC and WMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer