PAHC vs. WMT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) and Walmart Inc. (WMT).

Performance

PAHC vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAHC vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAHC Phibro Animal Health Corporation	46.91%	80.76%	86.30%	-10.42%	-32.33%	7.28%	-20.09%	-21.31%	-3.00%	15.75%
WMT Walmart Inc.	12.19%	24.49%	73.99%	12.88%	-0.46%	1.97%	23.32%	30.16%	-3.43%	46.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PAHC : $2.24B WMT : $999.04B
EPS PAHC : $2.25 WMT : $2.73
PE Ratio PAHC : 24.29 WMT : 45.71
PEG Ratio PAHC : 0.06 WMT : 2.98
PS Ratio PAHC : 1.53 WMT : 1.40
PB Ratio PAHC : 6.75 WMT : 10.03
Total Revenue (TTM) PAHC : $1.46B WMT : $713.16B
Gross Profit (TTM) PAHC : $467.02M WMT : $177.77B
EBITDA (TTM) PAHC : $209.00M WMT : $48.50B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAHC achieves a 46.91% return, which is significantly higher than WMT's 12.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PAHC has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 9.42%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.52% annualized return.

PAHC

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 46.91%
• 6M: 34.89%
• 1Y: 152.57%
• 3Y*: 56.73%
• 5Y*: 19.98%
• 10Y*: 9.42%

WMT

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -1.66%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 6M: 22.84%
• 1Y: 41.67%
• 3Y*: 37.98%
• 5Y*: 24.13%
• 10Y*: 20.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PAHC vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAHC

PAHC Risk / Return Rank: 95
PAHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PAHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PAHC Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PAHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PAHC Martin Ratio Rank: 95

WMT

WMT Risk / Return Rank: 88
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAHC vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAHC	WMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.90	1.73	+1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.81	2.66	+1.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.33	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.45	3.97	+2.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.51	10.92	+6.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAHC vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAHC Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAHC and WMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAHC	WMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.90	1.73	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	1.15	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.95	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.64	-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between PAHC and WMT is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PAHC vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

PAHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than WMT's 0.76% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAHC Phibro Animal Health Corporation	0.88%	1.28%	2.29%	4.15%	3.58%	2.35%	2.47%	1.93%	1.31%	1.19%	1.37%	1.33%
WMT Walmart Inc.	0.76%	0.84%	0.92%	1.45%	1.58%	1.52%	1.50%	1.78%	2.23%	2.07%	2.89%	3.20%

Drawdowns

PAHC vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAHC drawdown since its inception was -79.62%, roughly equal to the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAHC and WMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAHC	WMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.62%	-77.14%	-2.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.52%	-10.92%	-13.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.71%	-25.74%	-39.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.62%	-25.74%	-53.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.95%	-6.64%	+2.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.24%	-14.66%	-24.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.13%	3.97%	+5.16%

Volatility

PAHC vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) has a higher volatility of 13.07% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 5.93%. This indicates that PAHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAHC	WMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.07%	5.93%	+7.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.35%	17.03%	+17.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.96%	24.17%	+28.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.84%	21.09%	+23.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.67%	21.70%	+21.97%

Financials

PAHC vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Phibro Animal Health Corporation and Walmart Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PAHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Phibro Animal Health Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.66M and revenue of 373.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 47.04B and revenue of 190.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.7%.

PAHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Phibro Animal Health Corporation reported an operating income of 50.33M and revenue of 373.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.5%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 8.71B and revenue of 190.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.

PAHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Phibro Animal Health Corporation reported a net income of 27.46M and revenue of 373.91M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 4.24B and revenue of 190.66B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.