PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAG vs. KR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAG vs. KR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) and The Kroger Co. (KR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAG achieves a 39.69% return, which is significantly higher than KR's -6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PAG has outperformed KR with an annualized return of 22.15%, while KR has yielded a comparatively lower 8.08% annualized return.


PAG

1D
-1.50%
1M
21.12%
6M
41.02%
YTD
39.69%
1Y
33.52%
3Y*
13.27%
5Y*
22.59%
10Y*
22.15%
ALL TIME*
10.89%

KR

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.82%
6M
-7.18%
YTD
-6.63%
1Y
-17.40%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
8.08%
ALL TIME*
11.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$363.70M$442.10M$468.76M
$163.42M$109.11M$69.60M

PAG vs. KR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAG
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
39.69%7.13%-2.54%42.29%9.22%84.36%20.12%28.91%-13.21%-5.10%
KR
The Kroger Co.
-6.63%4.25%36.91%4.99%0.44%45.41%11.90%7.90%2.08%-18.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PAG and KR is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 1996

0.21

The correlation between PAG and KR shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAG:

$14.29B

KR:

$35.37B

EPS

PAG:

$14.21

KR:

$1.64

PE Ratio

PAG:

15.29

KR:

35.18

PS Ratio

PAG:

0.43

KR:

0.25

PB Ratio

PAG:

2.45

KR:

5.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAG:

$32.92B

KR:

$148.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAG:

$5.31B

KR:

$34.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAG:

$1.41B

KR:

$5.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAG vs. KR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAG
PAG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAG Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

KR
KR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
KR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
KR Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
KR Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAG vs. KR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) and The Kroger Co. (KR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAGKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.93

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

-0.61

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.01

-1.23

+4.24

PAG vs. KR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the KR Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAG and KR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAG vs. KR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAG drawdown since its inception was -83.34%, which is greater than KR's maximum drawdown of -66.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAG and KR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAGKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.34%

-66.81%

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.03%

-26.16%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-26.16%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

-31.07%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.98%

-43.83%

-16.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-23.22%

+20.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-22.44%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.39%

12.93%

-1.54%

Volatility

PAG vs. KR - Volatility Comparison

Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) has a higher volatility of 12.40% compared to The Kroger Co. (KR) at 9.42%. This indicates that PAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAGKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.40%

9.42%

+2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.89%

23.16%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.84%

28.42%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.27%

27.33%

+4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.69%

29.17%

+6.52%

Dividends

PAG vs. KR - Dividend Comparison

PAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than KR's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KR
The Kroger Co.
2.42%2.14%2.00%2.41%2.11%1.72%2.14%2.07%1.93%1.79%1.30%0.94%
PAG
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
2.54%3.27%2.68%1.73%1.80%1.66%1.41%3.15%3.52%2.63%2.12%2.22%

Financials

PAG vs. KR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Penske Automotive Group, Inc. and The Kroger Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PAG vs. KR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Penske Automotive Group, Inc. and The Kroger Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Penske Automotive Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 8.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.9%.

KR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 10.63B and revenue of 46.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.0%.

PAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Penske Automotive Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 337.60M and revenue of 8.51B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

KR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of 1.41B and revenue of 46.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

PAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Penske Automotive Group, Inc. reported a net income of 260.40M and revenue of 8.51B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

KR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of 903.00M and revenue of 46.12B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAG and KR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAG has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to KR (9.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAG dropped -83.34% vs KR's -66.81%.

PAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAG and KR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer