PortfoliosLab logo
PAG vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PAG and COST is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PAG vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PAG:

0.15

COST:

1.30

Sortino Ratio

PAG:

0.67

COST:

1.71

Omega Ratio

PAG:

1.08

COST:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

PAG:

0.43

COST:

1.54

Martin Ratio

PAG:

0.97

COST:

4.48

Ulcer Index

PAG:

8.64%

COST:

5.94%

Daily Std Dev

PAG:

28.22%

COST:

21.84%

Max Drawdown

PAG:

-83.33%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

PAG:

-6.12%

COST:

-7.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAG:

$10.97B

COST:

$443.25B

EPS

PAG:

$14.19

COST:

$17.17

PE Ratio

PAG:

11.69

COST:

58.18

PEG Ratio

PAG:

1.99

COST:

5.29

PS Ratio

PAG:

0.36

COST:

1.68

PB Ratio

PAG:

1.95

COST:

17.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAG:

$30.61B

COST:

$264.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAG:

$5.04B

COST:

$35.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAG:

$1.54B

COST:

$11.25B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PAG having a 8.33% return and COST slightly higher at 8.48%. Over the past 10 years, PAG has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 15.18%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.42% annualized return.


PAG

YTD

8.33%

1M

8.32%

6M

3.21%

1Y

4.23%

5Y*

42.89%

10Y*

15.18%

COST

YTD

8.48%

1M

1.38%

6M

6.45%

1Y

28.12%

5Y*

29.32%

10Y*

23.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PAG vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PAG is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PAG is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PAG is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PAG is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PAG is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PAG is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PAG vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAG and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PAG vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

PAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than COST's 0.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PAG
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
2.71%2.68%1.73%1.80%1.66%1.41%3.15%3.52%2.63%2.12%2.22%1.59%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.48%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

PAG vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAG drawdown since its inception was -83.33%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAG and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PAG vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) have volatilities of 6.12% and 6.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PAG vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Penske Automotive Group, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
7.60B
63.72B
(PAG) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PAG vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Penske Automotive Group, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20212022202320242025
16.7%
15.1%
(PAG) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
PAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Penske Automotive Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.27B and revenue of 7.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.7%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.61B and revenue of 63.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

PAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Penske Automotive Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 315.50M and revenue of 7.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

PAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Penske Automotive Group, Inc. reported a net income of 244.30M and revenue of 7.60B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.