PAF.L vs. TCEHY
Compare and contrast key facts about Pan African Resources plc (PAF.L) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PAF.L or TCEHY.
Key characteristics
| PAF.L | TCEHY | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 97.81% | 32.02% |
| 1Y Return | 118.19% | 25.41% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 33.27% | -2.44% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 28.16% | 5.12% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.51% | 13.80% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.82 | 0.87 |
| Daily Std Dev | 41.81% | 30.84% |
| Max Drawdown | -80.77% | -73.15% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -44.66% |
Fundamentals
| PAF.L | TCEHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | £638.19M | $460.56B |
| EPS | £0.03 | $2.24 |
| PE Ratio | 11.10 | 22.35 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | £234.27M | $630.44B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | £86.93M | $319.12B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | £99.44M | $231.86B |
Correlation
The correlation between PAF.L and TCEHY is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PAF.L vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PAF.L achieves a 97.81% return, which is significantly higher than TCEHY's 32.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PAF.L has underperformed TCEHY with an annualized return of 12.51%, while TCEHY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.80% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PAF.L vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pan African Resources plc (PAF.L) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PAF.L vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison
PAF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than TCEHY's 0.88% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAF.L Pan African Resources plc | 2.25% | 4.45% | 5.44% | 5.51% | 2.75% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 3.37% | 567.74% | 694.53% | 744.83% | 592.59% |
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited | 0.88% | 6.80% | 4.27% | 0.35% | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.29% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.24% | 0.04% | 0.20% |
Drawdowns
PAF.L vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAF.L drawdown since its inception was -80.77%, which is greater than TCEHY's maximum drawdown of -73.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAF.L and TCEHY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PAF.L vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison
Pan African Resources plc (PAF.L) has a higher volatility of 13.03% compared to Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) at 5.29%. This indicates that PAF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCEHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PAF.L vs. TCEHY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pan African Resources plc and Tencent Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities