PAAS vs. AGQ
PAAS (Pan American Silver Corp.) is a stock, while AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) is Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). Over the past 10 years, PAAS returned 14.77%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for AGQ. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PAAS vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAAS achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -29.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PAAS has outperformed AGQ with an annualized return of 14.77%, while AGQ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.51% annualized return.
PAAS
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 20.73%
- 1Y
- 102.22%
- 3Y*
- 53.57%
- 5Y*
- 12.68%
- 10Y*
- 14.77%
AGQ
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- -29.18%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 149.89%
- 3Y*
- 55.60%
- 5Y*
- 15.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
PAAS vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. | 3.00% | 160.40% | 26.61% | 2.50% | -33.00% | -26.78% | 46.88% | 63.86% | -5.30% | 3.86% |
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -29.18% | 360.71% | 23.92% | -15.09% | -7.89% | -32.25% | 62.02% | 20.02% | -22.10% | 5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAAS and AGQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2008 | 0.69 |
The correlation between PAAS and AGQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAAS vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank
PAAS
AGQ
PAAS vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAAS | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 1.98 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 3.75 | +5.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAAS | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.25 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.21 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.18 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.08 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
PAAS vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAAS drawdown since its inception was -85.10%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAS and AGQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAAS | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.10% | -98.16% | +13.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.90% | -76.21% | +44.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.90% | -76.21% | +44.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.02% | -76.21% | +16.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.74% | -76.25% | +9.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.32% | -84.96% | +62.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.65% | -79.86% | +38.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.64% | 40.19% | -28.55% |
Volatility
PAAS vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) is 19.47%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 33.59%. This indicates that PAAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAAS | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.47% | 33.59% | -14.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.85% | 133.69% | -89.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.19% | 120.79% | -66.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.69% | 74.68% | -26.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.47% | 65.65% | -16.18% |
Dividends
PAAS vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
PAAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. | 1.17% | 0.89% | 1.98% | 2.45% | 2.75% | 1.36% | 0.64% | 0.59% | 0.96% | 0.64% | 0.33% | 4.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAAS and AGQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGQ has higher volatility (33.59%) compared to PAAS (19.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAAS dropped -85.10% vs AGQ's -98.16%.
PAAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAAS and AGQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer