PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OZK vs. RF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OZK vs. RF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bank OZK (OZK) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OZK achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly higher than RF's 3.05% return. Over the past 10 years, OZK has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 5.38%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 15.25% annualized return.


OZK

1D
-1.71%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
5.71%
6M
4.28%
1Y
9.90%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
5.38%

RF

1D
-2.25%
1M
0.01%
YTD
3.05%
6M
6.59%
1Y
32.36%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
15.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OZK vs. RF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OZK
Bank OZK
5.71%7.45%-7.36%29.12%-11.24%53.15%7.57%38.23%-52.03%-6.51%
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
3.05%21.99%27.00%-5.69%2.33%39.39%-1.61%33.35%-20.59%22.95%

Correlation

The correlation between OZK and RF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.58

The correlation between OZK and RF shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OZK:

$5.29B

RF:

$23.78B

EPS

OZK:

$6.28

RF:

$2.51

PE Ratio

OZK:

7.60

RF:

10.90

PS Ratio

OZK:

1.92

RF:

2.52

PB Ratio

OZK:

0.91

RF:

1.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

OZK:

$2.80B

RF:

$9.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OZK:

$1.56B

RF:

$7.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

OZK:

$992.96M

RF:

$2.90B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OZK vs. RF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OZK
OZK Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
OZK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OZK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
OZK Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
OZK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OZK Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

RF
RF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RF Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OZK vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank OZK (OZK) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OZKRFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.24

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

1.76

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

4.23

-3.11

OZK vs. RF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OZK Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the RF Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OZK and RF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OZKRFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

1.32

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.27

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.43

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.18

+0.39

Drawdowns

OZK vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OZK drawdown since its inception was -70.41%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OZK and RF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OZKRFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.41%

-92.65%

+22.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.03%

-18.45%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.23%

-32.35%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.26%

-40.99%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.41%

-60.73%

-9.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.62%

-9.77%

+2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.64%

-31.08%

+15.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.88%

7.67%

+1.21%

Volatility

OZK vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bank OZK (OZK) is 5.84%, while Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that OZK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OZKRFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

6.85%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.25%

17.88%

-1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.79%

24.75%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.69%

31.53%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.98%

35.92%

+3.06%

Dividends

OZK vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

OZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than RF's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OZK
Bank OZK
3.81%3.78%3.55%2.85%3.15%2.43%3.45%3.08%3.48%1.47%1.20%1.11%
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
3.87%5.12%4.17%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%

Financials

OZK vs. RF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank OZK and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
661.55M
2.33B
(OZK) Total Revenue
(RF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OZK vs. RF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bank OZK and Regions Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
56.9%
76.6%
Portfolio components
OZK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank OZK reported a gross profit of 376.15M and revenue of 661.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

RF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.78B and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.6%.

OZK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank OZK reported an operating income of 211.61M and revenue of 661.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.0%.

RF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 714.00M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.

OZK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank OZK reported a net income of 163.36M and revenue of 661.55M, resulting in a net margin of 24.7%.

RF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 559.00M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OZK and RF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RF has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to OZK (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OZK dropped -70.41% vs RF's -92.65%.

RF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OZK and RF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer