PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OXM vs. COLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OXM vs. COLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oxford Industries, Inc. (OXM) and Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OXM achieves a 16.46% return, which is significantly higher than COLM's 8.89% return. Over the past 10 years, OXM has underperformed COLM with an annualized return of -1.14%, while COLM has yielded a comparatively higher 2.12% annualized return.


OXM

1D
-0.86%
1M
10.60%
6M
6.34%
YTD
16.46%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
-25.57%
5Y*
-12.04%
10Y*
-1.14%
ALL TIME*
8.54%

COLM

1D
-5.43%
1M
-6.22%
6M
8.51%
YTD
8.89%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
-6.80%
5Y*
-8.38%
10Y*
2.12%
ALL TIME*
8.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$43.78M$35.43M$35.09M
$13.64M$15.47M$17.79M

OXM vs. COLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OXM
Oxford Industries, Inc.
16.46%-53.99%-18.95%10.03%-6.08%57.54%-11.15%8.27%-4.04%27.37%
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Company
8.89%-33.05%7.08%-7.79%-8.79%12.63%-12.50%20.33%18.23%24.85%

Correlation

The correlation between OXM and COLM is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1998

0.45

The correlation between OXM and COLM shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OXM:

$566.18M

COLM:

$3.04B

EPS

OXM:

-$1.87

COLM:

$3.87

PS Ratio

OXM:

0.38

COLM:

0.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

OXM:

$1.48B

COLM:

$3.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OXM:

$881.86M

COLM:

$1.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

OXM:

$31.72M

COLM:

$303.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OXM vs. COLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OXM
OXM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
OXM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
OXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
OXM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

COLM
COLM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
COLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
COLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OXM vs. COLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oxford Industries, Inc. (OXM) and Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OXMCOLMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.07

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

0.38

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

0.93

-0.64

OXM vs. COLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OXM Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the COLM Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OXM and COLM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OXM vs. COLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OXM drawdown since its inception was -93.57%, which is greater than COLM's maximum drawdown of -63.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OXM and COLM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OXMCOLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.57%

-63.18%

-30.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.33%

-19.10%

-18.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.43%

-46.09%

-23.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.00%

-51.16%

-19.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.00%

-53.92%

-17.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.62%

-43.20%

-20.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.29%

-20.81%

-5.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.68%

8.07%

+13.61%

Volatility

OXM vs. COLM - Volatility Comparison

Oxford Industries, Inc. (OXM) has a higher volatility of 14.76% compared to Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) at 9.51%. This indicates that OXM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OXMCOLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.76%

9.51%

+5.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.60%

28.27%

+12.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.55%

40.03%

+24.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.69%

32.25%

+15.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.95%

32.85%

+13.10%

Dividends

OXM vs. COLM - Dividend Comparison

OXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, more than COLM's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Company
2.02%2.18%1.43%1.51%1.37%1.07%0.30%0.96%1.07%1.02%1.18%1.23%
OXM
Oxford Industries, Inc.
7.33%8.01%3.38%2.50%2.22%1.44%1.71%1.92%1.82%1.44%1.76%1.50%

Financials

OXM vs. COLM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Oxford Industries, Inc. and Columbia Sportswear Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

OXM vs. COLM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Oxford Industries, Inc. and Columbia Sportswear Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

OXM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Oxford Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 196.68M and revenue of 374.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.5%.

COLM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported a gross profit of 358.43M and revenue of 614.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.

OXM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Oxford Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.42M and revenue of 374.49M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.

COLM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported an operating income of 35.05M and revenue of 614.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

OXM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Oxford Industries, Inc. reported a net income of -7.08M and revenue of 374.49M, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.

COLM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Columbia Sportswear Company reported a net income of 26.55M and revenue of 614.36M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OXM and COLM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OXM has higher volatility (14.76%) compared to COLM (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OXM dropped -93.57% vs COLM's -63.18%.

COLM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OXM and COLM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer