PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
OXIG.L vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


OXIG.LMSFT
YTD Return-7.47%14.14%
1Y Return2.57%16.11%
3Y Return (Ann)-1.23%9.25%
5Y Return (Ann)7.22%24.47%
10Y Return (Ann)7.13%26.07%
Sharpe Ratio0.160.83
Sortino Ratio0.431.17
Omega Ratio1.051.15
Calmar Ratio0.161.04
Martin Ratio0.402.54
Ulcer Index11.97%6.37%
Daily Std Dev30.27%19.56%
Max Drawdown-74.05%-69.41%
Current Drawdown-24.56%-8.53%

Fundamentals


OXIG.LMSFT
Market Cap£1.18B$3.15T
EPS£0.86$12.12
PE Ratio23.6634.90
PEG Ratio0.002.21
Total Revenue (TTM)£260.70M$254.19B
Gross Profit (TTM)£126.50M$176.28B
EBITDA (TTM)£49.50M$139.70B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between OXIG.L and MSFT is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

OXIG.L vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, OXIG.L achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's 14.14% return. Over the past 10 years, OXIG.L has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 7.13%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 26.07% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-12.46%
1.58%
OXIG.L
MSFT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

OXIG.L vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oxford Instruments plc (OXIG.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OXIG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for OXIG.L, currently valued at -0.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for OXIG.L, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for OXIG.L, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for OXIG.L, currently valued at -0.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.00
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for OXIG.L, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.01
MSFT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.71
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.88
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.12

OXIG.L vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OXIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OXIG.L and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.00
0.71
OXIG.L
MSFT

Dividends

OXIG.L vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

OXIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than MSFT's 0.53% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
OXIG.L
Oxford Instruments plc
0.99%1.51%0.81%0.81%0.21%0.94%1.46%1.53%1.78%1.69%0.97%0.63%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.53%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%2.59%

Drawdowns

OXIG.L vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OXIG.L drawdown since its inception was -74.05%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OXIG.L and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-24.82%
-8.53%
OXIG.L
MSFT

Volatility

OXIG.L vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Oxford Instruments plc (OXIG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.88% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 7.74%. This indicates that OXIG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.88%
7.74%
OXIG.L
MSFT

Financials

OXIG.L vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Oxford Instruments plc and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. OXIG.L values in GBp, MSFT values in USD