PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
OWL vs. VGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between OWL and VGT is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

OWL vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
40.66%
13.27%
OWL
VGT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

OWL:

1.18

VGT:

1.16

Sortino Ratio

OWL:

1.65

VGT:

1.60

Omega Ratio

OWL:

1.22

VGT:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

OWL:

1.92

VGT:

1.70

Martin Ratio

OWL:

5.35

VGT:

5.91

Ulcer Index

OWL:

7.29%

VGT:

4.39%

Daily Std Dev

OWL:

33.20%

VGT:

22.33%

Max Drawdown

OWL:

-50.53%

VGT:

-54.63%

Current Drawdown

OWL:

-9.41%

VGT:

-0.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWL achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 3.52% return.


OWL

YTD

3.91%

1M

-0.45%

6M

40.26%

1Y

40.79%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VGT

YTD

3.52%

1M

2.58%

6M

10.89%

1Y

28.80%

5Y*

20.51%

10Y*

20.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

OWL vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OWL is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OWL is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OWL is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OWL is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OWL is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OWL is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGT is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGT is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGT is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGT is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGT is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGT is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

OWL vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for OWL, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.001.181.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for OWL, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.651.60
The chart of Omega ratio for OWL, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.221.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for OWL, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.921.70
The chart of Martin ratio for OWL, currently valued at 5.35, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.355.91
OWL
VGT

The current OWL Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWL and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.18
1.16
OWL
VGT

Dividends

OWL vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

OWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than VGT's 0.58% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
3.58%2.92%3.69%4.06%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.58%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%1.12%

Drawdowns

OWL vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWL drawdown since its inception was -50.53%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWL and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-9.41%
-0.55%
OWL
VGT

Volatility

OWL vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 7.66%. This indicates that OWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.66%
7.66%
OWL
VGT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab