OVL vs. SCHG
OVL (Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. OVL is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OVL returned 14.74%/yr vs 16.21%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OVL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
OVL vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OVL achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.74% return.
OVL
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 35.48%
- 3Y*
- 24.65%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 25.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.21%
- 10Y*
- 18.92%
OVL vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 14.28% | 17.81% | 27.91% | 28.01% | -22.18% | 32.40% | 20.17% | 10.84% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 7.74% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between OVL and SCHG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between OVL and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
OVL vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OVL
SCHG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
OVL
SCHG
Financial Services
OVL
SCHG
Communication Services
OVL
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
OVL
SCHG
Healthcare
OVL
SCHG
Industrials
OVL
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
OVL
SCHG
Energy
OVL
SCHG
Utilities
OVL
SCHG
Real Estate
OVL
SCHG
Basic Materials
OVL
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OVL vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
OVL
SCHG
OVL vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OVL | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.56 | 1.76 | +0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.39 | 2.37 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.31 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 1.70 | +2.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.35 | 5.70 | +12.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OVL | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 1.76 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.73 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.85 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
OVL vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OVL drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVL and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OVL | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -34.59% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -16.41% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.73% | -23.39% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.23% | -34.59% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.57% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.71% | -5.20% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 4.90% | -2.94% |
Volatility
OVL vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) is 2.87%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that OVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OVL | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 3.31% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | 11.56% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 15.45% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 22.27% | -2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 21.55% | +0.99% |
OVL vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
OVL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
OVL vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
OVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 6.12% | 2.99% | 3.10% | 3.33% | 3.85% | 3.63% | 2.43% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, OVL and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHG has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to OVL (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVL dropped -35.49% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 16.21% vs 14.74% for OVL. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, OVL has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 16.21% return vs 14.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OVL.
OVL has the higher dividend yield at 6.12%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.
They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OVL and 0.04% for SCHG.
OVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OVL and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer