OTPIX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund (OTPIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
OTPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Aug 7, 2000. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
OTPIX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OTPIX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTPIX ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund | -9.35% | 18.08% | 23.19% | 51.66% | -34.36% | 48.75% | 45.00% | 36.58% | -1.75% | 29.45% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -10.59% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTPIX achieves a -9.35% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, OTPIX has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 18.04%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.83% annualized return.
OTPIX
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -8.13%
- YTD
- -9.35%
- 6M
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- 17.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- 18.04%
SCHG
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OTPIX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
OTPIX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OTPIX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
OTPIX
SCHG
OTPIX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund (OTPIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OTPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 0.75 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 1.03 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.93 | 3.54 | +0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OTPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.75 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.57 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.79 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.79 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between OTPIX and SCHG is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OTPIX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
OTPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTPIX ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund | 1.90% | 1.72% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.31% | 1.10% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
OTPIX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTPIX drawdown since its inception was -78.93%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTPIX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.93% | -34.59% | -44.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.72% | -16.41% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.93% | -34.59% | -44.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.93% | -34.59% | -44.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.17% | -13.34% | -58.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -5.22% | -17.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 4.78% | -1.22% |
Volatility
OTPIX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund (OTPIX) is 5.39%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that OTPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OTPIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 6.67% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 12.51% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.47% | 22.43% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 139.67% | 22.32% | +117.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.85% | 21.51% | +78.34% |