PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPAL vs. RYCEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OPAL vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OPAL Fuels Inc (OPAL) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPAL achieves a -3.18% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 7.91% return.


OPAL

1D
0.44%
1M
3.64%
YTD
-3.18%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
-32.54%
3Y*
-28.77%
5Y*
10Y*

RYCEY

1D
-1.69%
1M
4.65%
YTD
7.91%
6M
17.47%
1Y
38.93%
3Y*
110.91%
5Y*
62.18%
10Y*
7.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPAL vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OPAL
OPAL Fuels Inc
-3.18%-30.53%-38.59%-24.18%-6.55%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
7.91%123.64%88.21%253.27%-7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between OPAL and RYCEY is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2022

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OPAL:

$64.52M

RYCEY:

$141.92B

EPS

OPAL:

$0.33

RYCEY:

$0.99

PE Ratio

OPAL:

6.82

RYCEY:

17.06

PEG Ratio

OPAL:

0.03

RYCEY:

0.04

PS Ratio

OPAL:

0.20

RYCEY:

3.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

OPAL:

$336.94M

RYCEY:

$40.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OPAL:

$76.87M

RYCEY:

$10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

OPAL:

$13.69M

RYCEY:

$8.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPAL vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPAL
OPAL Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
OPAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPAL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
OPAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPAL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPAL vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OPAL Fuels Inc (OPAL) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OPALRYCEYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.44

1.04

-1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.25

1.67

-1.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.20

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

1.80

-2.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.18

5.14

-6.33

OPAL vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPAL and RYCEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OPALRYCEYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

1.04

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

-0.23

-0.17

Drawdowns

OPAL vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPAL drawdown since its inception was -88.70%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPAL and RYCEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPALRYCEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.70%

-99.07%

+10.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.85%

-21.75%

-19.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.30%

-23.37%

-60.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.17%

-78.58%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.15%

-84.19%

+26.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.20%

7.59%

+22.61%

Volatility

OPAL vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

OPAL Fuels Inc (OPAL) has a higher volatility of 14.44% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 13.12%. This indicates that OPAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPALRYCEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.44%

13.12%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.54%

32.77%

+22.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.83%

37.76%

+37.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.63%

43.52%

+24.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.63%

49.34%

+18.29%

Dividends

OPAL vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

OPAL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OPAL
OPAL Fuels Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.75%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%

Financials

OPAL vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OPAL Fuels Inc and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
73.38M
11.64B
(OPAL) Total Revenue
(RYCEY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OPAL vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between OPAL Fuels Inc and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
27.4%
Portfolio components
OPAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OPAL Fuels Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 73.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

OPAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OPAL Fuels Inc reported an operating income of -11.30M and revenue of 73.38M, resulting in an operating margin of -15.4%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

OPAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OPAL Fuels Inc reported a net income of -2.64M and revenue of 73.38M, resulting in a net margin of -3.6%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OPAL and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPAL has higher volatility (14.44%) compared to RYCEY (13.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPAL dropped -88.70% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.

RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPAL and RYCEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer