PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ONTO vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ONTO and COST is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

ONTO vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-18.34%
12.31%
ONTO
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ONTO:

0.24

COST:

2.51

Sortino Ratio

ONTO:

0.69

COST:

3.11

Omega Ratio

ONTO:

1.09

COST:

1.45

Calmar Ratio

ONTO:

0.39

COST:

4.57

Martin Ratio

ONTO:

0.86

COST:

11.75

Ulcer Index

ONTO:

15.16%

COST:

3.99%

Daily Std Dev

ONTO:

53.73%

COST:

18.69%

Max Drawdown

ONTO:

-98.56%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

ONTO:

-26.79%

COST:

-4.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ONTO:

$8.51B

COST:

$435.99B

EPS

ONTO:

$3.70

COST:

$16.98

PE Ratio

ONTO:

46.55

COST:

57.84

PEG Ratio

ONTO:

0.86

COST:

5.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

ONTO:

$942.24M

COST:

$258.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ONTO:

$466.13M

COST:

$32.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

ONTO:

$242.12M

COST:

$12.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONTO achieves a 13.98% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 44.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ONTO has outperformed COST with an annualized return of 26.58%, while COST has yielded a comparatively lower 23.44% annualized return.


ONTO

YTD

13.98%

1M

4.80%

6M

-18.34%

1Y

13.23%

5Y*

36.87%

10Y*

26.58%

COST

YTD

44.75%

1M

-1.46%

6M

12.31%

1Y

45.50%

5Y*

28.65%

10Y*

23.44%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ONTO vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ONTO, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.242.51
The chart of Sortino ratio for ONTO, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.693.11
The chart of Omega ratio for ONTO, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.091.45
The chart of Calmar ratio for ONTO, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.394.57
The chart of Martin ratio for ONTO, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.8611.75
ONTO
COST

The current ONTO Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONTO and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.24
2.51
ONTO
COST

Dividends

ONTO vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

ONTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.05%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

ONTO vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONTO drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONTO and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-26.79%
-4.50%
ONTO
COST

Volatility

ONTO vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) has a higher volatility of 9.45% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 3.87%. This indicates that ONTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
9.45%
3.87%
ONTO
COST

Financials

ONTO vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Onto Innovation Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab