PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEQ vs. AGTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly higher than AGTHX's 10.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ has outperformed AGTHX with an annualized return of 19.68%, while AGTHX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.97% annualized return.


ONEQ

1D
-0.85%
1M
7.21%
YTD
16.16%
6M
15.18%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
27.68%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*
19.68%

AGTHX

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.81%
YTD
10.09%
6M
9.70%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
15.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
16.16%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
10.09%19.73%28.02%37.22%-30.75%19.32%37.83%28.16%-3.15%26.14%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and AGTHX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2003

0.93

The correlation between ONEQ and AGTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. AGTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

AGTHX
AGTHX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AGTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AGTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEQAGTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

1.95

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.46

7.61

+4.86

ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the AGTHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and AGTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEQAGTHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.77

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.62

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.81

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.71

-0.06

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than AGTHX's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and AGTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEQAGTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.09%

-51.91%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-13.76%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-21.57%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-36.38%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

-36.38%

+1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.33%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-9.20%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.52%

-0.33%

Volatility

ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) at 3.67%. This indicates that ONEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEQAGTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.67%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

11.65%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

15.15%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.14%

20.25%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.71%

19.69%

+2.02%

ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than AGTHX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than AGTHX's 9.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
9.71%10.69%8.99%7.40%4.05%8.18%4.30%7.15%11.99%7.03%6.61%8.87%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.67%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ONEQ and AGTHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ONEQ has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to AGTHX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEQ dropped -55.09% vs AGTHX's -51.91%.

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEQ and AGTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer