ONEQ vs. AGTHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX).
ONEQ is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Composite Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2003. AGTHX is managed by Equity. It was launched on Dec 1, 1973.
Performance
ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock | -5.66% | 20.89% | 29.30% | 45.73% | -32.12% | 22.11% | 44.87% | 38.01% | -3.18% | 29.29% |
AGTHX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A | -8.07% | 19.73% | 28.02% | 37.22% | -30.75% | 19.32% | 37.83% | 28.16% | -3.15% | 26.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a -5.66% return, which is significantly higher than AGTHX's -8.07% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ has outperformed AGTHX with an annualized return of 17.32%, while AGTHX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.32% annualized return.
ONEQ
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -3.52%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 17.32%
AGTHX
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- -8.07%
- 6M
- -7.16%
- 1Y
- 16.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.26%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than AGTHX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ONEQ vs. AGTHX — Risk / Return Rank
ONEQ
AGTHX
ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ONEQ | AGTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.84 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 1.34 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.19 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 1.26 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.64 | 4.78 | +2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ONEQ | AGTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.84 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.45 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.73 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.68 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEQ and AGTHX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Dividend Comparison
ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than AGTHX's 11.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock | 0.82% | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 2.51% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
AGTHX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A | 11.63% | 10.69% | 8.99% | 7.40% | 4.05% | 8.18% | 4.30% | 7.15% | 11.99% | 7.03% | 6.61% | 8.87% |
Drawdowns
ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than AGTHX's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and AGTHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEQ | AGTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.09% | -51.91% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.13% | -13.76% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.23% | -36.38% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.23% | -36.38% | +1.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.26% | -10.70% | +2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -9.23% | +1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 3.63% | -0.06% |
Volatility
ONEQ vs. AGTHX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) have volatilities of 7.03% and 6.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ONEQ | AGTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 6.76% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 12.13% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.24% | 21.01% | +2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.16% | 20.23% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 19.64% | +2.03% |