ON vs. CRUS
ON (ON Semiconductor Corporation) and CRUS (Cirrus Logic, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, ON returned 30.01%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for CRUS. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ON vs. CRUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ON achieves a 147.33% return, which is significantly higher than CRUS's 50.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ON has outperformed CRUS with an annualized return of 30.01%, while CRUS has yielded a comparatively lower 17.39% annualized return.
ON
- 1D
- 4.11%
- 1M
- 31.25%
- YTD
- 147.33%
- 6M
- 134.35%
- 1Y
- 182.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 28.51%
- 10Y*
- 30.01%
CRUS
- 1D
- 4.85%
- 1M
- 8.97%
- YTD
- 50.97%
- 6M
- 46.46%
- 1Y
- 78.83%
- 3Y*
- 31.03%
- 5Y*
- 18.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
ON vs. CRUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 147.33% | -14.12% | -24.52% | 33.93% | -8.17% | 107.52% | 34.25% | 47.67% | -21.16% | 64.11% |
CRUS Cirrus Logic, Inc. | 50.97% | 19.00% | 19.70% | 11.69% | -19.06% | 11.95% | -0.25% | 148.37% | -36.02% | -8.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between ON and CRUS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2000 | 0.48 |
The correlation between ON and CRUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ON:
$52.78B
CRUS:
$9.37B
ON:
$1.42
CRUS:
$7.84
ON:
94.51
CRUS:
22.82
ON:
8.94
CRUS:
4.73
ON:
7.23
CRUS:
4.40
ON:
$6.06B
CRUS:
$2.00B
ON:
$2.26B
CRUS:
$1.05B
ON:
$1.21B
CRUS:
$503.58M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ON vs. CRUS — Risk / Return Rank
ON
CRUS
ON vs. CRUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ON | CRUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.37 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.54 | 4.97 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | 13.02 | +0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ON | CRUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.49 | 2.28 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.51 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.43 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.11 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
ON vs. CRUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ON drawdown since its inception was -96.22%, roughly equal to the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ON and CRUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ON | CRUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.22% | -97.48% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.10% | -15.94% | -12.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.44% | -46.85% | -23.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.44% | -46.85% | -23.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.44% | -55.94% | -14.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.23% | -52.76% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.86% | 6.07% | +7.79% |
Volatility
ON vs. CRUS - Volatility Comparison
ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) has a higher volatility of 19.99% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) at 11.67%. This indicates that ON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ON | CRUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.99% | 11.67% | +8.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.66% | 24.96% | +13.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.87% | 34.85% | +19.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.95% | 36.04% | +16.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.92% | 40.18% | +10.74% |
Dividends
ON vs. CRUS - Dividend Comparison
Neither ON nor CRUS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ON vs. CRUS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ON Semiconductor Corporation and Cirrus Logic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ON vs. CRUS - Profitability Comparison
ON - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 583.10M and revenue of 1.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.
CRUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 237.64M and revenue of 448.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.
ON - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -53.40M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.
CRUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported an operating income of 90.30M and revenue of 448.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
ON - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of -33.40M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.
CRUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a net income of 81.81M and revenue of 448.52M, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ON and CRUS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ON has higher volatility (19.99%) compared to CRUS (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ON dropped -96.22% vs CRUS's -97.48%.
ON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ON and CRUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer