OMI vs. PDCO
Compare and contrast key facts about Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) and Patterson Companies, Inc. (PDCO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: OMI or PDCO.
Correlation
The correlation between OMI and PDCO is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
OMI vs. PDCO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
OMI:
-0.92
PDCO:
0.60
OMI:
-1.69
PDCO:
1.65
OMI:
0.76
PDCO:
1.26
OMI:
-0.84
PDCO:
0.59
OMI:
-1.53
PDCO:
2.41
OMI:
47.51%
PDCO:
11.49%
OMI:
79.02%
PDCO:
46.04%
OMI:
-93.26%
PDCO:
-70.34%
OMI:
-86.10%
PDCO:
-14.76%
Fundamentals
OMI:
$523.01M
PDCO:
$2.77B
OMI:
-$4.73
PDCO:
$1.53
OMI:
4.07
PDCO:
2.10
OMI:
0.05
PDCO:
0.43
OMI:
0.91
PDCO:
2.80
OMI:
$8.09B
PDCO:
$6.51B
OMI:
$1.62B
PDCO:
$1.33B
OMI:
-$42.10M
PDCO:
$323.25M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMI achieves a -48.20% return, which is significantly lower than PDCO's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, OMI has underperformed PDCO with an annualized return of -13.38%, while PDCO has yielded a comparatively higher -0.62% annualized return.
OMI
-48.20%
-31.41%
-51.75%
-72.76%
-0.93%
-13.38%
PDCO
1.52%
0.48%
51.92%
26.29%
18.95%
-0.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
OMI vs. PDCO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
OMI
PDCO
OMI vs. PDCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) and Patterson Companies, Inc. (PDCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
OMI vs. PDCO - Dividend Comparison
OMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMI Owens & Minor, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.23% | 13.51% | 5.47% | 2.89% | 2.81% | 2.85% |
PDCO Patterson Companies, Inc. | 2.49% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 3.71% | 3.54% | 3.51% | 5.08% | 5.29% | 2.82% | 2.29% | 1.90% | 1.58% |
Drawdowns
OMI vs. PDCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMI drawdown since its inception was -93.26%, which is greater than PDCO's maximum drawdown of -70.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMI and PDCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
OMI vs. PDCO - Volatility Comparison
Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) has a higher volatility of 16.18% compared to Patterson Companies, Inc. (PDCO) at 2.15%. This indicates that OMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
OMI vs. PDCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Owens & Minor, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities