OMI vs. BAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) and Baxter International Inc. (BAX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: OMI or BAX.
Correlation
The correlation between OMI and BAX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
OMI vs. BAX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
OMI:
-0.75
BAX:
-0.87
OMI:
-0.89
BAX:
-1.17
OMI:
0.88
BAX:
0.86
OMI:
-0.55
BAX:
-0.35
OMI:
-1.12
BAX:
-1.49
OMI:
37.24%
BAX:
15.58%
OMI:
56.00%
BAX:
26.60%
OMI:
-93.26%
BAX:
-68.86%
OMI:
-74.09%
BAX:
-66.14%
Fundamentals
OMI:
$1.02B
BAX:
$15.13B
OMI:
-$0.63
BAX:
$0.25
OMI:
4.07
BAX:
1.70
OMI:
$10.66B
BAX:
$13.99B
OMI:
$2.07B
BAX:
$5.28B
OMI:
$466.02M
BAX:
$1.92B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMI achieves a -34.51% return, which is significantly lower than BAX's -23.09% return. Over the past 10 years, OMI has underperformed BAX with an annualized return of -8.32%, while BAX has yielded a comparatively higher -1.89% annualized return.
OMI
-34.51%
1.69%
-25.46%
-37.59%
20.53%
-8.32%
BAX
-23.09%
-10.68%
-13.91%
-22.97%
-17.31%
-1.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
OMI vs. BAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) and Baxter International Inc. (BAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
OMI vs. BAX - Dividend Comparison
OMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Owens & Minor, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.23% | 13.51% | 5.47% | 2.89% | 2.81% | 2.85% | 2.63% |
Baxter International Inc. | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.26% | 1.27% | 1.21% | 1.02% | 1.11% | 0.94% | 1.14% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
OMI vs. BAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMI drawdown since its inception was -93.26%, which is greater than BAX's maximum drawdown of -68.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMI and BAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
OMI vs. BAX - Volatility Comparison
Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) has a higher volatility of 17.14% compared to Baxter International Inc. (BAX) at 6.49%. This indicates that OMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
OMI vs. BAX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Owens & Minor, Inc. and Baxter International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities