OMI vs. BAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) and Baxter International Inc. (BAX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: OMI or BAX.
Correlation
The correlation between OMI and BAX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
OMI vs. BAX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
OMI:
-0.94
BAX:
-0.89
OMI:
-1.76
BAX:
-1.21
OMI:
0.76
BAX:
0.84
OMI:
-0.85
BAX:
-0.43
OMI:
-1.57
BAX:
-1.79
OMI:
47.28%
BAX:
16.32%
OMI:
79.02%
BAX:
32.80%
OMI:
-93.26%
BAX:
-68.86%
OMI:
-86.35%
BAX:
-67.27%
Fundamentals
OMI:
$513.74M
BAX:
$14.26B
OMI:
-$4.73
BAX:
-$0.64
OMI:
4.07
BAX:
1.81
OMI:
0.05
BAX:
1.34
OMI:
0.91
BAX:
2.05
OMI:
$8.09B
BAX:
$9.26B
OMI:
$1.62B
BAX:
$3.42B
OMI:
-$42.10M
BAX:
$256.00M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMI achieves a -49.12% return, which is significantly lower than BAX's -4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, OMI has underperformed BAX with an annualized return of -13.54%, while BAX has yielded a comparatively higher -1.57% annualized return.
OMI
-49.12%
-29.18%
-52.47%
-73.39%
-1.48%
-13.54%
BAX
-4.20%
-19.63%
-23.39%
-28.72%
-19.45%
-1.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
OMI vs. BAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
OMI
BAX
OMI vs. BAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) and Baxter International Inc. (BAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
OMI vs. BAX - Dividend Comparison
OMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMI Owens & Minor, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.23% | 13.51% | 5.47% | 2.89% | 2.81% | 2.85% |
BAX Baxter International Inc. | 3.31% | 3.57% | 3.00% | 2.26% | 1.27% | 1.21% | 1.02% | 1.11% | 0.94% | 1.14% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
OMI vs. BAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMI drawdown since its inception was -93.26%, which is greater than BAX's maximum drawdown of -68.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMI and BAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
OMI vs. BAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) is 15.80%, while Baxter International Inc. (BAX) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that OMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
OMI vs. BAX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Owens & Minor, Inc. and Baxter International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities