PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMFS vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OMFS vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMFS achieves a 18.33% return, which is significantly higher than AVDV's 12.96% return.


OMFS

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.48%
6M
11.99%
YTD
18.33%
1Y
33.45%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.34%

AVDV

1D
-0.48%
1M
0.21%
6M
4.97%
YTD
12.96%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
24.60%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$74.82M$104.24M$85.42M
$494.23K$429.77K$649.60K

OMFS vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
18.33%13.34%3.98%15.12%-17.29%28.60%15.02%6.82%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
12.96%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%11.78%

Correlation

The correlation between OMFS and AVDV is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.68

The correlation between OMFS and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

OMFS vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OMFS
AVDV

Financial Services

26.7%
13.6%

Healthcare

15.1%
2.4%

Technology

13.9%
7.6%

Real Estate

12.4%
1.2%

Industrials

11.0%
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
15.9%

Energy

3.5%
9.1%

Basic Materials

3.5%
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
3.7%

Communication Services

1.2%
2.2%

Utilities

0.7%
1.5%

Financial Services

OMFS
26.7%
AVDV
13.6%

Healthcare

OMFS
15.1%
AVDV
2.4%

Technology

OMFS
13.9%
AVDV
7.6%

Real Estate

OMFS
12.4%
AVDV
1.2%

Industrials

OMFS
11.0%
AVDV
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

OMFS
8.9%
AVDV
15.9%

Energy

OMFS
3.5%
AVDV
9.1%

Basic Materials

OMFS
3.5%
AVDV
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

OMFS
3.2%
AVDV
3.7%

Communication Services

OMFS
1.2%
AVDV
2.2%

Utilities

OMFS
0.7%
AVDV
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMFS vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OMFS
OMFS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
OMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
OMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OMFS vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OMFSAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

2.64

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

9.60

+1.83

OMFS vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMFS Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMFS and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OMFS vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMFS drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, roughly equal to the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFS and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMFSAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-43.01%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-13.19%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.35%

-14.17%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.22%

-28.08%

-1.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-3.96%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-6.71%

-3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.63%

-0.93%

Volatility

OMFS vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is 3.76%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that OMFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMFSAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

5.49%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

14.73%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

16.82%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.22%

17.43%

+3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.16%

19.72%

+4.44%

OMFS vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMFS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

OMFS vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

OMFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than AVDV's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.80%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
1.09%0.80%1.87%1.27%1.84%0.66%1.07%1.29%1.50%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


OMFS and AVDV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVDV has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to OMFS (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFS dropped -42.50% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.72% vs 7.25% for OMFS. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, OMFS has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for OMFS.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.09% for OMFS.

OMFS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for OMFS and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMFS and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer