OMFS vs. AVDV
OMFS (Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OMFS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. OMFS is passively managed, while AVDV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, OMFS returned 5.57%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for AVDV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OMFS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.
Performance
OMFS vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMFS achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 16.04% return.
OMFS
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- —
AVDV
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 44.23%
- 3Y*
- 28.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
OMFS vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 13.70% | 13.34% | 3.98% | 15.12% | -17.29% | 28.60% | 15.02% | 8.10% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 16.04% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMFS and AVDV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between OMFS and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
OMFS vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OMFS
AVDV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
OMFS
AVDV
Industrials
OMFS
AVDV
Technology
OMFS
AVDV
Healthcare
OMFS
AVDV
Real Estate
OMFS
AVDV
Consumer Cyclical
OMFS
AVDV
Energy
OMFS
AVDV
Consumer Defensive
OMFS
AVDV
Basic Materials
OMFS
AVDV
Utilities
OMFS
AVDV
Communication Services
OMFS
AVDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMFS vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
OMFS
AVDV
OMFS vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OMFS | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.52 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 3.37 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | 13.67 | -3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OMFS | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 2.86 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.80 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.80 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
OMFS vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMFS drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, roughly equal to the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFS and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMFS | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.50% | -43.01% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -13.19% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.35% | -14.17% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.22% | -28.08% | -1.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -1.35% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -6.77% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 3.24% | -0.51% |
Volatility
OMFS vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) have volatilities of 4.97% and 4.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMFS | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 4.92% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 13.07% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 15.56% | +2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 17.30% | +4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 19.73% | +4.58% |
OMFS vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
OMFS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
OMFS vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
OMFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than AVDV's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.74% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 0.91% | 0.80% | 1.87% | 1.27% | 1.84% | 0.66% | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.50% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OMFS and AVDV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OMFS has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to AVDV (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFS dropped -42.50% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.72% vs 5.57% for OMFS. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for OMFS.
AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 0.91% for OMFS.
OMFS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for OMFS and 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMFS and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer