OMFL vs. COWZ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

OMFL (Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OMFL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OMFL returned 9.73%/yr vs 11.04%/yr for COWZ. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OMFL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.

Performance

OMFL vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMFL achieves a 14.92% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 12.39% return.

OMFL

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 1.61%
• 6M: 11.19%
• YTD: 14.92%
• 1Y: 22.88%
• 3Y*: 13.08%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.09%

COWZ

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 5.50%
• 6M: 8.21%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 1Y: 24.54%
• 3Y*: 11.99%
• 5Y*: 11.04%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	$63.88M	$58.45M	$60.21M
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	$6.98M	$7.56M	$9.22M

OMFL vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	14.92%	13.68%	6.82%	21.53%	-13.97%	28.95%	20.91%	35.58%	-2.55%	5.12%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	12.39%	8.98%	10.64%	14.73%	0.19%	42.57%	11.65%	23.41%	-10.05%	7.96%

Correlation

The correlation between OMFL and COWZ is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between OMFL and COWZ has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OMFL vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OMFL	COWZ
Technology	35.7%	22.9%
Healthcare	12.6%	19.9%
Industrials	10.6%	8.4%
Financial Services	10.1%	-
Communication Services	8.1%	8.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	14.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	10.6%
Basic Materials	2.4%	4.0%
Energy	2.4%	11.2%
Utilities	2.2%	-
Real Estate	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

OMFL vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OMFL

OMFL Risk / Return Rank: 80
OMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
OMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
OMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 75
OMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
OMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 87
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 85
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OMFL vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OMFL	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	2.09	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	3.08	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.37	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	4.14	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.26	12.12	+1.14

OMFL vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMFL and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OMFL vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFL and COWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	OMFL	COWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.24%	-38.63%	+5.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.58%	-5.95%	-1.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.52%	-22.00%	+6.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.44%	-22.00%	-0.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.83%	+0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.73%	-4.76%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	2.03%	-0.30%

Volatility

OMFL vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is 2.82%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that OMFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OMFL	COWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	4.86%	-2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.75%	8.75%	+1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.61%	11.84%	+0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.65%	17.69%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.99%	19.86%	+0.13%

OMFL vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMFL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

OMFL vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than COWZ's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	1.84%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	0.80%	0.80%	1.22%	1.37%	1.55%	0.95%	1.48%	1.53%	1.39%	0.32%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OMFL and COWZ in my portfolio?

OMFL and COWZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OMFL or COWZ?

COWZ has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to OMFL (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFL dropped -33.24% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

Which ETF is better, OMFL or COWZ?

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 11.04% vs 9.73% for OMFL. On fees, OMFL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, OMFL has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OMFL or COWZ?

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 11.04% return vs 9.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OMFL or COWZ?

OMFL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OMFL or COWZ?

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.80% for OMFL.

What is the main difference between OMFL and COWZ?

OMFL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. OMFL tracks Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for OMFL and 0.49% for COWZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.