OIH vs. UCO
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO).
OIH and UCO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OIH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. UCO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008. Both OIH and UCO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: OIH or UCO.
Correlation
The correlation between OIH and UCO is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
OIH vs. UCO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
OIH:
-0.51
UCO:
-0.13
OIH:
-0.56
UCO:
0.12
OIH:
0.93
UCO:
1.01
OIH:
-0.18
UCO:
-0.06
OIH:
-1.09
UCO:
-0.37
OIH:
12.34%
UCO:
16.33%
OIH:
26.63%
UCO:
45.14%
OIH:
-94.24%
UCO:
-99.95%
OIH:
-76.31%
UCO:
-99.58%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OIH achieves a -13.91% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, OIH has outperformed UCO with an annualized return of -8.34%, while UCO has yielded a comparatively lower -28.60% annualized return.
OIH
-13.91%
-9.81%
-11.49%
-14.88%
1.44%
-8.34%
UCO
-0.46%
-0.50%
-21.32%
-9.03%
-27.01%
-28.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OIH vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
OIH vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
OIH vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison
Neither OIH nor UCO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OIH VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF | 0.00% | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.23% | 2.20% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.40% | 2.39% | 2.38% | 1.13% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
OIH vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.24%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and UCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
OIH vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) is 7.23%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 10.36%. This indicates that OIH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.