OFS vs. CGBD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

OFS (OFS Capital Corporation) and CGBD (TCG BDC, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, OFS returned -7.41%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for CGBD. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

OFS vs. CGBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) and TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OFS achieves a -21.80% return, which is significantly lower than CGBD's -10.44% return.

OFS

• 1D: 5.71%
• 1M: -11.11%
• YTD: -21.80%
• 6M: -23.74%
• 1Y: -50.66%
• 3Y*: -16.46%
• 5Y*: -7.41%
• 10Y*: -0.93%

CGBD

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: -10.75%
• YTD: -10.44%
• 6M: -10.74%
• 1Y: -11.72%
• 3Y*: 2.34%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OFS vs. CGBD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OFS OFS Capital Corporation	-21.80%	-31.59%	-20.19%	29.93%	3.28%	66.92%	-25.16%	17.95%	-0.24%	-10.06%
CGBD TCG BDC, Inc.	-10.44%	-21.53%	33.53%	18.01%	17.70%	49.48%	-8.34%	21.62%	-31.01%	18.17%

Correlation

The correlation between OFS and CGBD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017	0.27

Fundamentals

EPS OFS : -$2.79 CGBD : $1.02
Total Revenue (TTM) OFS : -$11.87M CGBD : $226.59M
Gross Profit (TTM) OFS : -$26.47M CGBD : $123.55M
EBITDA (TTM) OFS : -$33.16M CGBD : $85.61M

Return for Risk

OFS vs. CGBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OFS

OFS Risk / Return Rank: 7
OFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
OFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
OFS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
OFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
OFS Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CGBD

CGBD Risk / Return Rank: 18
CGBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
CGBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
CGBD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CGBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CGBD Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OFS vs. CGBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) and TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OFS	CGBD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.06	-0.54	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.66	-0.66	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	0.93	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	-0.60	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	-1.20	-0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OFS vs. CGBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OFS Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the CGBD Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OFS and CGBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OFS	CGBD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.06	-0.54	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.22	0.33	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.19	-0.16

Drawdowns

OFS vs. CGBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OFS drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, roughly equal to the maximum CGBD drawdown of -71.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OFS and CGBD.

Drawdown Indicators

	OFS	CGBD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.09%	-71.09%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.17%	-19.72%	-44.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.97%	-35.06%	-31.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.97%	-35.06%	-31.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.48%	-32.11%	-26.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.28%	-12.48%	-1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.43%	9.77%	+27.66%

Volatility

OFS vs. CGBD - Volatility Comparison

OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) has a higher volatility of 15.81% compared to TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) at 6.49%. This indicates that OFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OFS	CGBD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.81%	6.49%	+9.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.33%	17.51%	+22.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.79%	21.77%	+26.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.70%	21.59%	+12.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.21%	34.73%	+5.48%

Dividends

OFS vs. CGBD - Dividend Comparison

OFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.98%, more than CGBD's 14.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGBD TCG BDC, Inc.	14.83%	13.21%	10.43%	11.76%	11.46%	10.92%	14.33%	13.00%	13.55%	6.09%	0.00%	0.00%
OFS OFS Capital Corporation	28.98%	25.00%	16.85%	11.45%	11.43%	8.35%	12.03%	12.18%	12.83%	11.43%	9.88%	11.85%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OFS and CGBD in my portfolio?

OFS and CGBD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OFS or CGBD?

OFS has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to CGBD (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OFS dropped -69.09% vs CGBD's -71.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.54 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.