PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OFIGX vs. RWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OFIGX vs. RWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oberweis Focused International Growth Fund (OFIGX) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OFIGX vs. RWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OFIGX
Oberweis Focused International Growth Fund
-5.06%35.83%10.26%16.59%-22.73%
RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
0.74%18.65%16.45%17.43%-7.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OFIGX achieves a -5.06% return, which is significantly lower than RWL's 0.74% return.


OFIGX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-13.43%
YTD
-5.06%
6M
-3.55%
1Y
13.26%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10Y*

RWL

1D
2.04%
1M
-4.73%
YTD
0.74%
6M
4.59%
1Y
17.35%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
12.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OFIGX vs. RWL - Expense Ratio Comparison

OFIGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RWL's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OFIGX vs. RWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OFIGX
OFIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
OFIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OFIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
OFIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OFIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
OFIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

RWL
RWL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
RWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OFIGX vs. RWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oberweis Focused International Growth Fund (OFIGX) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OFIGXRWLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

1.15

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.98

1.68

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

1.64

-0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.77

7.90

-5.13

OFIGX vs. RWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OFIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the RWL Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OFIGX and RWL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OFIGXRWLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

1.15

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.55

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between OFIGX and RWL is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

OFIGX vs. RWL - Dividend Comparison

OFIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than RWL's 1.38% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OFIGX
Oberweis Focused International Growth Fund
0.77%0.73%0.00%1.44%1.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
1.38%1.35%1.43%1.60%1.62%1.35%1.75%1.87%1.99%1.60%1.71%1.97%

Drawdowns

OFIGX vs. RWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OFIGX drawdown since its inception was -30.21%, smaller than the maximum RWL drawdown of -54.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OFIGX and RWL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OFIGXRWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.21%

-54.83%

+24.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-11.26%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.43%

-4.73%

-8.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-6.50%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

2.33%

+1.16%

Volatility

OFIGX vs. RWL - Volatility Comparison

Oberweis Focused International Growth Fund (OFIGX) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) at 3.96%. This indicates that OFIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OFIGXRWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

3.96%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

7.71%

+3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.81%

15.13%

+2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.96%

14.55%

+3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

16.89%

+1.07%