PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OEF vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OEF vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.28% return. Over the past 10 years, OEF has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 16.82%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.48% annualized return.


OEF

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.92%
YTD
10.47%
6M
10.56%
1Y
31.56%
3Y*
24.90%
5Y*
16.14%
10Y*
16.82%

VTV

1D
0.88%
1M
3.55%
YTD
12.28%
6M
14.14%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OEF vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
10.47%19.80%30.74%32.71%-21.03%29.18%21.21%31.87%-4.16%21.82%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.28%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between OEF and VTV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between OEF and VTV has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OEF vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OEF
VTV

Technology

41.0%
13.4%

Communication Services

14.5%
3.3%

Financial Services

10.7%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
4.0%

Healthcare

8.3%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
9.4%

Industrials

5.3%
14.0%

Energy

2.6%
8.1%

Utilities

0.9%
5.2%

Basic Materials

0.5%
3.1%

Real Estate

0.3%
2.8%

Technology

OEF
41.0%
VTV
13.4%

Communication Services

OEF
14.5%
VTV
3.3%

Financial Services

OEF
10.7%
VTV
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

OEF
10.5%
VTV
4.0%

Healthcare

OEF
8.3%
VTV
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

OEF
5.4%
VTV
9.4%

Industrials

OEF
5.3%
VTV
14.0%

Energy

OEF
2.6%
VTV
8.1%

Utilities

OEF
0.9%
VTV
5.2%

Basic Materials

OEF
0.5%
VTV
3.1%

Real Estate

OEF
0.3%
VTV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OEF vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OEF
OEF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
OEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
OEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OEF vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OEFVTVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.50

2.67

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

3.82

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.48

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

4.27

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.32

16.15

-3.84

OEF vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OEF and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OEFVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.67

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.82

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.75

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.51

-0.06

Drawdowns

OEF vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OEFVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.11%

-59.27%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-6.35%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

-14.52%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.47%

-17.04%

-9.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

-36.78%

+5.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-7.87%

-3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.68%

+0.94%

Volatility

OEF vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that OEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OEFVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

2.65%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

7.59%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

10.11%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

13.88%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

16.67%

+1.78%

OEF vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OEF vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
0.83%0.81%1.03%1.19%1.55%1.06%1.43%1.87%2.09%1.81%2.07%2.11%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


OEF and VTV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OEF has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, OEF leads with 16.82% vs 12.48% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, OEF has performed better with a 16.82% return vs 12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for OEF.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.83% for OEF.

OEF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. OEF tracks S&P 100 Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OEF and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer