OCSL vs. RPIFX
OCSL (Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation) is a stock, while RPIFX (T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund) is Bank Loan fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, OCSL returned 6.54%/yr vs 4.65%/yr for RPIFX. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
OCSL vs. RPIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCSL achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly lower than RPIFX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, OCSL has outperformed RPIFX with an annualized return of 6.54%, while RPIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.65% annualized return.
OCSL
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 1Y
- -3.03%
- 3Y*
- -6.47%
- 5Y*
- 0.48%
- 10Y*
- 6.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.85%
RPIFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- 4.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.26M | $5.20M | $7.41M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
OCSL vs. RPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCSL Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation | -2.74% | -6.06% | -15.15% | 11.25% | 3.74% | 44.99% | 11.00% | 38.74% | -6.31% | -1.09% |
RPIFX T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund | 0.83% | 6.71% | 8.47% | 10.13% | -1.96% | 4.67% | 2.42% | 8.82% | 0.39% | 3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCSL and RPIFX is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2008 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCSL vs. RPIFX — Risk / Return Rank
OCSL
RPIFX
OCSL vs. RPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OCSL | RPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.51 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 2.49 | -2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 8.11 | -8.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OCSL vs. RPIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCSL drawdown since its inception was -59.52%, which is greater than RPIFX's maximum drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCSL and RPIFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCSL | RPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.52% | -25.10% | -34.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.46% | -1.44% | -18.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.16% | -2.28% | -31.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.16% | -5.90% | -28.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.32% | -19.67% | -37.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.50% | -0.39% | -26.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.74% | -1.33% | -15.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.68% | 0.44% | +8.24% |
Volatility
OCSL vs. RPIFX - Volatility Comparison
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) at 0.33%. This indicates that OCSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCSL | RPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 0.33% | +5.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.18% | 1.69% | +16.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.19% | 2.33% | +19.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 2.76% | +17.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.86% | 3.79% | +23.07% |
Dividends
OCSL vs. RPIFX - Dividend Comparison
OCSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.26%, more than RPIFX's 5.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCSL Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation | 13.26% | 13.27% | 14.40% | 11.12% | 11.86% | 7.37% | 7.27% | 6.96% | 8.75% | 8.38% | 13.41% | 10.84% |
RPIFX T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund | 5.80% | 7.22% | 7.77% | 6.53% | 4.12% | 3.94% | 4.29% | 5.12% | 5.16% | 4.32% | 4.31% | 4.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OCSL and RPIFX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OCSL has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to RPIFX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCSL dropped -59.52% vs RPIFX's -25.10%.
RPIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OCSL and RPIFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer