PortfoliosLab logo
OCSL vs. PFLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between OCSL and PFLT is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

OCSL vs. PFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
42.93%
171.13%
OCSL
PFLT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

OCSL:

-0.97

PFLT:

-0.08

Sortino Ratio

OCSL:

-1.21

PFLT:

0.03

Omega Ratio

OCSL:

0.83

PFLT:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

OCSL:

-0.72

PFLT:

-0.08

Martin Ratio

OCSL:

-1.75

PFLT:

-0.27

Ulcer Index

OCSL:

12.26%

PFLT:

5.75%

Daily Std Dev

OCSL:

22.24%

PFLT:

20.35%

Max Drawdown

OCSL:

-59.52%

PFLT:

-69.77%

Current Drawdown

OCSL:

-27.61%

PFLT:

-11.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OCSL:

$1.12B

PFLT:

$894.51M

EPS

OCSL:

$0.12

PFLT:

$1.37

PE Ratio

OCSL:

113.25

PFLT:

7.42

PEG Ratio

OCSL:

0.93

PFLT:

0.27

PS Ratio

OCSL:

3.02

PFLT:

4.11

PB Ratio

OCSL:

0.76

PFLT:

0.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

OCSL:

$100.21M

PFLT:

$110.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

OCSL:

$9.09M

PFLT:

$133.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

OCSL:

$67.31M

PFLT:

$84.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCSL achieves a -10.01% return, which is significantly lower than PFLT's -4.62% return. Over the past 10 years, OCSL has underperformed PFLT with an annualized return of 5.62%, while PFLT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.65% annualized return.


OCSL

YTD

-10.01%

1M

0.68%

6M

-10.79%

1Y

-20.98%

5Y*

12.21%

10Y*

5.62%

PFLT

YTD

-4.62%

1M

8.19%

6M

-5.08%

1Y

-3.50%

5Y*

20.17%

10Y*

6.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

OCSL vs. PFLT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCSL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OCSL is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OCSL is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OCSL is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OCSL is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OCSL is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OCSL is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

PFLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PFLT is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PFLT is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PFLT is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PFLT is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PFLT is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PFLT is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

OCSL vs. PFLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current OCSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the PFLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCSL and PFLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.95
-0.17
OCSL
PFLT

Dividends

OCSL vs. PFLT - Dividend Comparison

OCSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.89%, more than PFLT's 12.26% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation
15.89%14.40%11.12%11.86%7.37%7.27%6.96%8.75%8.38%13.41%10.85%12.88%
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
12.26%11.25%9.98%10.38%8.93%10.83%9.36%9.85%8.31%8.08%10.04%7.87%

Drawdowns

OCSL vs. PFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCSL drawdown since its inception was -59.52%, smaller than the maximum PFLT drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCSL and PFLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-27.61%
-11.23%
OCSL
PFLT

Volatility

OCSL vs. PFLT - Volatility Comparison

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) has a higher volatility of 13.43% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) at 10.12%. This indicates that OCSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.43%
10.12%
OCSL
PFLT

Financials

OCSL vs. PFLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M20212022202320242025
-40.19M
30.01M
(OCSL) Total Revenue
(PFLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OCSL vs. PFLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
99.0%
(OCSL) Gross Margin
(PFLT) Gross Margin
OCSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation reported a gross profit of -40.19M and revenue of -40.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

PFLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported a gross profit of 29.70M and revenue of 30.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.0%.

OCSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation reported an operating income of -35.99M and revenue of -40.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 89.5%.

PFLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported an operating income of 28.00M and revenue of 30.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 93.3%.

OCSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation reported a net income of -36.25M and revenue of -40.19M, resulting in a net margin of 90.2%.

PFLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. reported a net income of 28.33M and revenue of 30.01M, resulting in a net margin of 94.4%.