PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCSL vs. NMFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OCSL vs. NMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) and New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCSL achieves a -4.33% return, which is significantly higher than NMFC's -17.28% return. Over the past 10 years, OCSL has outperformed NMFC with an annualized return of 7.88%, while NMFC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.


OCSL

1D
-1.47%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
-4.33%
6M
-4.70%
1Y
-5.66%
3Y*
-4.04%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
7.88%

NMFC

1D
-1.26%
1M
-8.00%
YTD
-17.28%
6M
-16.28%
1Y
-21.62%
3Y*
-5.11%
5Y*
-0.67%
10Y*
5.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCSL vs. NMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation
-4.33%-6.06%-15.15%11.25%3.74%44.99%11.00%38.74%-6.31%-1.09%
NMFC
New Mountain Finance Corporation
-17.28%-7.17%-0.95%15.47%-0.55%31.94%-7.13%20.64%2.78%5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between OCSL and NMFC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2011

0.50

Over the past year, OCSL and NMFC have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

OCSL:

$1.17

NMFC:

$328.53

PE Ratio

OCSL:

9.78

NMFC:

0.02

PS Ratio

OCSL:

3.43

NMFC:

2.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

OCSL:

$293.40M

NMFC:

$315.55M

Gross Profit (TTM)

OCSL:

$174.66M

NMFC:

$203.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

OCSL:

$121.85M

NMFC:

$106.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCSL vs. NMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCSL
OCSL Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
OCSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCSL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OCSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCSL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

NMFC
NMFC Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
NMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCSL vs. NMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) and New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OCSLNMFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.85

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

-0.87

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.62

-1.66

+1.04

OCSL vs. NMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is higher than the NMFC Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCSL and NMFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OCSL vs. NMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCSL drawdown since its inception was -59.52%, smaller than the maximum NMFC drawdown of -64.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCSL and NMFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCSLNMFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.52%

-64.16%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.77%

-24.87%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.16%

-28.07%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.16%

-28.07%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.32%

-64.16%

+6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.70%

-28.07%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.69%

-5.49%

-11.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.15%

13.08%

-3.93%

Volatility

OCSL vs. NMFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) is 6.58%, while New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that OCSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCSLNMFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

6.99%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.82%

18.62%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.84%

23.02%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

18.55%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.89%

25.96%

+0.93%

Dividends

OCSL vs. NMFC - Dividend Comparison

OCSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.49%, less than NMFC's 17.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMFC
New Mountain Finance Corporation
17.11%13.90%12.17%11.40%9.86%8.76%10.92%9.90%10.81%10.04%9.65%10.45%
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation
13.49%13.27%14.40%11.12%11.86%7.37%7.27%6.96%8.75%8.38%13.41%10.84%

Financials

OCSL vs. NMFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation and New Mountain Finance Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M20222023202420252026
65.25M
68.79M
(OCSL) Total Revenue
(NMFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


OCSL and NMFC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMFC has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to OCSL (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCSL dropped -59.52% vs NMFC's -64.16%.

OCSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCSL and NMFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer