OBSOX vs. IWM
OBSOX (Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both funds - OBSOX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Oberweis, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Over the past 10 years, OBSOX returned 18.67%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for IWM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OBSOX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
OBSOX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBSOX achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 18.69% return. Over the past 10 years, OBSOX has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 18.67%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.08% annualized return.
OBSOX
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 32.65%
- 6M
- 33.47%
- 1Y
- 58.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.87%
- 5Y*
- 16.20%
- 10Y*
- 18.67%
IWM
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 43.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
OBSOX vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBSOX Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund | 32.65% | 14.28% | 16.13% | 15.81% | -11.17% | 43.39% | 32.52% | 25.06% | -7.05% | 25.55% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 18.69% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBSOX and IWM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2000 | 0.89 |
The correlation between OBSOX and IWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBSOX vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
OBSOX
IWM
OBSOX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBSOX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 2.27 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.05 | 3.12 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.37 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.22 | 3.97 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.37 | 14.12 | +5.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBSOX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.27 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.29 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.48 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.37 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
OBSOX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBSOX drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBSOX and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBSOX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -59.05% | -21.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -11.03% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.74% | -27.50% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -31.91% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.79% | -41.13% | -1.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.13% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.55% | -10.77% | -19.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 3.10% | -0.03% |
Volatility
OBSOX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX) has a higher volatility of 8.66% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.56%. This indicates that OBSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBSOX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.66% | 5.56% | +3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.24% | 13.52% | +6.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.47% | 19.14% | +6.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 22.52% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.76% | 23.04% | +1.72% |
OBSOX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBSOX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBSOX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
OBSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.87% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
OBSOX Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 21.88% | 4.05% | 3.04% | 28.22% | 6.36% | 4.24% | 11.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBSOX and IWM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OBSOX has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to IWM (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBSOX dropped -80.52% vs IWM's -59.05%.
OBSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBSOX and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer