OANMX vs. TRLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX).
OANMX is managed by Oakmark. It was launched on Nov 30, 2016. TRLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 31, 2001.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: OANMX or TRLGX.
Key characteristics
| OANMX | TRLGX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.82% | 31.91% |
| 1Y Return | 37.09% | 40.65% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.26% | 4.39% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.67% | 15.02% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.71 | 2.50 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.85 | 3.30 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.49 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.85 | 1.72 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.73 | 15.19 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.44% | 2.60% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.24% | 15.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.36% | -56.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between OANMX and TRLGX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
OANMX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, OANMX achieves a 19.82% return, which is significantly lower than TRLGX's 31.91% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OANMX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OANMX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
OANMX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
OANMX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison
OANMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while TRLGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OANMX Oakmark Fund Institutional Class | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.17% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 1.00% | 0.96% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.03% | 0.07% | 0.04% |
Drawdowns
OANMX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OANMX drawdown since its inception was -42.36%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -56.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OANMX and TRLGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
OANMX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison
Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.