O vs. AMT
Compare and contrast key facts about Realty Income Corporation (O) and American Tower Corporation (AMT).
Performance
O vs. AMT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, O achieves a 11.80% return, which is significantly higher than AMT's -1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, O has underperformed AMT with an annualized return of 5.14%, while AMT has yielded a comparatively higher 7.80% annualized return.
O
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 11.80%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 15.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.34%
- 5Y*
- 4.90%
- 10Y*
- 5.14%
AMT
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -8.95%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- -7.78%
- 1Y
- -21.19%
- 3Y*
- -1.49%
- 5Y*
- -3.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
O vs. AMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O Realty Income Corporation | 11.80% | 12.20% | -2.11% | -4.55% | -7.38% | 23.95% | -11.60% | 21.27% | 15.94% | 3.67% |
AMT American Tower Corporation | -1.05% | -0.92% | -12.16% | 5.37% | -25.67% | 32.89% | -0.48% | 47.87% | 13.32% | 37.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between O and AMT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.
Fundamentals
O:
$1.75
AMT:
$5.40
O:
35.63
AMT:
32.20
O:
7.30
AMT:
9.18
O:
6.56
AMT:
7.65
O:
$5.75B
AMT:
$10.65B
O:
-$3.85B
AMT:
$7.84B
O:
$4.22B
AMT:
$6.41B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
O vs. AMT — Risk / Return Rank
O
AMT
O vs. AMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Realty Income Corporation (O) and American Tower Corporation (AMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| O | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | -0.70 | +1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | -0.85 | +2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.90 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | -0.68 | +2.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | -1.10 | +5.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| O | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | -0.70 | +1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | -0.13 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.30 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.20 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
O vs. AMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum O drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum AMT drawdown of -98.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for O and AMT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| O | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.45% | -98.70% | +50.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.10% | -26.67% | +15.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -45.34% | +10.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | -45.34% | -2.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.51% | -34.39% | +26.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.22% | -26.99% | +17.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 16.35% | -12.62% |
Volatility
O vs. AMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Realty Income Corporation (O) is 4.57%, while American Tower Corporation (AMT) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that O experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| O | AMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 7.42% | -2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 17.67% | -6.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.81% | 25.05% | -8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 26.01% | -7.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 25.97% | -0.28% |
Dividends
O vs. AMT - Dividend Comparison
O's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than AMT's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O Realty Income Corporation | 5.20% | 6.19% | 5.37% | 5.33% | 4.68% | 3.87% | 4.51% | 3.69% | 4.19% | 4.45% | 4.18% | 4.41% |
AMT American Tower Corporation | 3.91% | 3.87% | 3.53% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 1.87% |
Financials
O vs. AMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Realty Income Corporation and American Tower Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities