NYXH vs. LU
NYXH (Nyxoah) and LU (Lufax Holding Ltd) are both stocks. NYXH operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while LU operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, NYXH returned -41.18%/yr vs -18.54%/yr for LU. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NYXH vs. LU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYXH achieves a -64.78% return, which is significantly lower than LU's -50.00% return.
NYXH
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -43.55%
- YTD
- -64.78%
- 6M
- -65.16%
- 1Y
- -79.12%
- 3Y*
- -41.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LU
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -21.95%
- YTD
- -50.00%
- 6M
- -51.52%
- 1Y
- -54.61%
- 3Y*
- -18.54%
- 5Y*
- -41.08%
- 10Y*
- —
NYXH vs. LU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NYXH Nyxoah | -64.78% | -42.50% | 72.41% | -7.01% | -78.30% | -23.38% |
LU Lufax Holding Ltd | -50.00% | 7.11% | 73.97% | -58.03% | -60.48% | -49.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYXH and LU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.09 |
The correlation between NYXH and LU shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NYXH:
€15.35M
LU:
CN¥31.92B
NYXH:
€7.60M
LU:
CN¥13.50B
NYXH:
-€81.42M
LU:
-CN¥1.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYXH vs. LU — Risk / Return Rank
NYXH
LU
NYXH vs. LU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nyxoah (NYXH) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NYXH | LU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 0.80 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.76 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | -1.35 | -0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NYXH vs. LU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYXH drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, roughly equal to the maximum LU drawdown of -96.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYXH and LU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYXH | LU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.46% | -96.68% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.18% | -71.59% | -12.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.28% | -71.59% | -21.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -94.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.62% | -95.59% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.19% | -78.47% | +6.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.84% | 40.52% | +6.32% |
Volatility
NYXH vs. LU - Volatility Comparison
Nyxoah (NYXH) has a higher volatility of 72.80% compared to Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) at 13.40%. This indicates that NYXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYXH | LU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 72.80% | 13.40% | +59.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.42% | 34.99% | +48.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.48% | 53.31% | +28.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.32% | 76.72% | -1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.32% | 76.15% | -0.83% |
Dividends
NYXH vs. LU - Dividend Comparison
Neither NYXH nor LU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LU Lufax Holding Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 101.26% | 11.60% | 26.29% |
NYXH Nyxoah | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NYXH vs. LU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nyxoah and Lufax Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NYXH and LU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NYXH has higher volatility (72.80%) compared to LU (13.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NYXH dropped -96.46% vs LU's -96.68%.
NYXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.97 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NYXH and LU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer