NXE vs. EFR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NXE (NexGen Energy Ltd.) and EFR (Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust) are both stocks. NXE operates in Uranium (Energy), while EFR operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, NXE returned 19.43%/yr vs 5.62%/yr for EFR. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NXE vs. EFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE) and Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXE achieves a 23.26% return, which is significantly higher than EFR's -2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, NXE has outperformed EFR with an annualized return of 19.43%, while EFR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.62% annualized return.

NXE

• 1D: -8.84%
• 1M: -8.99%
• YTD: 23.26%
• 6M: 21.80%
• 1Y: 78.02%
• 3Y*: 36.69%
• 5Y*: 18.61%
• 10Y*: 19.43%

EFR

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: -2.45%
• 6M: -1.69%
• 1Y: -3.85%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: 5.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXE vs. EFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NXE NexGen Energy Ltd.	23.26%	39.39%	-5.71%	58.01%	1.37%	58.33%	115.62%	-28.09%	-30.47%	48.75%
EFR Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust	-2.45%	-4.85%	11.32%	29.25%	-18.73%	22.88%	0.83%	16.43%	-6.96%	3.37%

Correlation

The correlation between NXE and EFR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.17

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) NXE : $0.00 EFR : $93.95M
Gross Profit (TTM) NXE : -$992.64K EFR : $86.69M
EBITDA (TTM) NXE : -$247.46M EFR : $109.68M

Return for Risk

NXE vs. EFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXE

NXE Risk / Return Rank: 79
NXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
NXE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
NXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
NXE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

EFR

EFR Risk / Return Rank: 22
EFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
EFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
EFR Omega Ratio Rank: 17
EFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
EFR Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXE vs. EFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE) and Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NXE	EFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	-0.48	+1.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	-0.64	+2.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.92	+0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	-0.34	+3.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.42	-0.72	+8.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NXE vs. EFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXE Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the EFR Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXE and EFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NXE	EFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	-0.48	+1.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.26	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.38	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.28	+0.27

Drawdowns

NXE vs. EFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXE drawdown since its inception was -82.98%, which is greater than EFR's maximum drawdown of -60.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXE and EFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NXE	EFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.98%	-60.55%	-22.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.35%	-11.49%	-12.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.28%	-18.30%	-35.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.28%	-25.07%	-29.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.98%	-42.04%	-40.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.53%	-11.44%	-7.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.64%	-9.01%	-19.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.54%	5.38%	+5.16%

Volatility

NXE vs. EFR - Volatility Comparison

NexGen Energy Ltd. (NXE) has a higher volatility of 18.77% compared to Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) at 1.94%. This indicates that NXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NXE	EFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.77%	1.94%	+16.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.21%	6.60%	+32.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.23%	8.06%	+46.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.86%	13.06%	+44.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.50%	14.96%	+46.54%

Dividends

NXE vs. EFR - Dividend Comparison

NXE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.09%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFR Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust	9.09%	9.53%	9.76%	10.37%	10.39%	5.62%	6.39%	7.34%	7.46%	5.42%	5.82%	6.95%
NXE NexGen Energy Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NXE and EFR in my portfolio?

NXE and EFR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NXE or EFR?

NXE has higher volatility (18.77%) compared to EFR (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXE dropped -82.98% vs EFR's -60.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.