NWS vs. SMH
NWS (News Corporation) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, NWS returned 10.37%/yr vs 33.99%/yr for SMH. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NWS vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWS achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 51.46% return. Over the past 10 years, NWS has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 10.37%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 33.99% annualized return.
NWS
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- -3.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.83%
SMH
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- 6M
- 33.70%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 1Y
- 92.69%
- 3Y*
- 53.04%
- 5Y*
- 32.99%
- 10Y*
- 33.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.63M | $34.76M | $47.75M | |
| $8.29B | $7.23B | $7.12B |
NWS vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWS News Corporation | 7.69% | -2.01% | 19.18% | 41.02% | -17.20% | 27.73% | 24.46% | 27.44% | -29.47% | 42.83% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 51.46% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWS and SMH is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2013 | 0.41 |
The correlation between NWS and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWS vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
NWS
SMH
NWS vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for News Corporation (NWS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NWS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.37 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 3.79 | -3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 15.18 | -15.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NWS vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWS drawdown since its inception was -51.84%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWS and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.84% | -84.96% | +33.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.84% | -24.62% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.84% | -35.74% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.90% | -45.30% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.84% | -45.30% | -6.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.00% | -18.46% | +9.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.18% | -40.89% | +24.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.08% | 6.13% | +8.95% |
Volatility
NWS vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for News Corporation (NWS) is 9.69%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that NWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWS | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.69% | 14.15% | -4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.52% | 32.94% | -11.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.14% | 38.50% | -11.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.98% | 36.51% | -8.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.71% | 33.33% | -3.62% |
Dividends
NWS vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
NWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than SMH's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWS News Corporation | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.66% | 0.78% | 1.08% | 0.89% | 1.13% | 1.38% | 1.73% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 0.72% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NWS and SMH have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to NWS (9.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWS dropped -51.84% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWS and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer