PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWS vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NWS vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in News Corporation (NWS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NWS vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWS
News Corporation
-3.43%-2.01%19.18%41.02%-17.20%27.73%24.46%27.44%-29.47%42.83%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
6.46%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWS achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 6.46% return. Over the past 10 years, NWS has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 8.97%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 31.28% annualized return.


NWS

1D
0.67%
1M
6.85%
YTD
-3.43%
6M
-17.18%
1Y
-5.49%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
8.97%

SMH

1D
5.76%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
6.46%
6M
17.84%
1Y
81.87%
3Y*
43.47%
5Y*
25.59%
10Y*
31.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWS vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWS
NWS Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWS Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
NWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWS vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for News Corporation (NWS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWSSMHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.21

2.23

-2.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.11

2.85

-2.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.40

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

5.10

-5.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.25

18.29

-18.55

NWS vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWS Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWS and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWSSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

2.23

-2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.74

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.97

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.28

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between NWS and SMH is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NWS vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

NWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than SMH's 0.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWS
News Corporation
0.70%0.67%0.66%0.78%1.08%0.89%1.13%1.38%1.73%1.20%1.69%0.72%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.29%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Drawdowns

NWS vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWS drawdown since its inception was -51.84%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWS and SMH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NWSSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.84%

-84.96%

+33.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.84%

-15.95%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.27%

-45.30%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.84%

-45.30%

-6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.39%

-10.03%

-8.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-41.36%

+25.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.74%

4.44%

+8.30%

Volatility

NWS vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for News Corporation (NWS) is 6.12%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 12.11%. This indicates that NWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NWSSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

12.11%

-5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.96%

23.95%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.76%

36.84%

-10.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.96%

34.71%

-6.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.67%

32.28%

-2.61%