PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NWL vs. VYM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NWL and VYM is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

NWL vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
60.34%
8.67%
NWL
VYM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NWL:

0.44

VYM:

2.11

Sortino Ratio

NWL:

1.37

VYM:

2.94

Omega Ratio

NWL:

1.17

VYM:

1.38

Calmar Ratio

NWL:

0.34

VYM:

3.88

Martin Ratio

NWL:

1.98

VYM:

11.19

Ulcer Index

NWL:

14.85%

VYM:

2.07%

Daily Std Dev

NWL:

66.35%

VYM:

11.00%

Max Drawdown

NWL:

-88.10%

VYM:

-56.98%

Current Drawdown

NWL:

-74.46%

VYM:

-1.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWL achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 3.21% return. Over the past 10 years, NWL has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of -9.11%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.24% annualized return.


NWL

YTD

1.61%

1M

-0.10%

6M

60.60%

1Y

30.65%

5Y*

-9.09%

10Y*

-9.11%

VYM

YTD

3.21%

1M

4.35%

6M

9.11%

1Y

22.75%

5Y*

10.23%

10Y*

10.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NWL vs. VYM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NWL is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NWL is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NWL is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NWL is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NWL is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NWL is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VYM is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VYM is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VYM is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VYM is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VYM is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VYM is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NWL vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NWL, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.442.11
The chart of Sortino ratio for NWL, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.372.94
The chart of Omega ratio for NWL, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.171.38
The chart of Calmar ratio for NWL, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.343.88
The chart of Martin ratio for NWL, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.9811.19
NWL
VYM

The current NWL Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWL and VYM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.44
2.11
NWL
VYM

Dividends

NWL vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

NWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than VYM's 2.65% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NWL
Newell Brands Inc.
2.77%2.81%5.07%7.03%4.21%4.33%4.79%4.95%2.85%1.70%1.72%1.73%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.65%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%2.78%

Drawdowns

NWL vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWL drawdown since its inception was -88.10%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWL and VYM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-74.46%
-1.51%
NWL
VYM

Volatility

NWL vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 4.52%. This indicates that NWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.54%
4.52%
NWL
VYM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab