NWL vs. KMI
NWL (Newell Brands Inc.) and KMI (Kinder Morgan, Inc.) are both stocks. NWL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while KMI operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, NWL returned -16.73%/yr vs 10.37%/yr for KMI. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NWL vs. KMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWL achieves a 55.91% return, which is significantly higher than KMI's 19.29% return. Over the past 10 years, NWL has underperformed KMI with an annualized return of -16.73%, while KMI has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.
NWL
- 1D
- 8.95%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- 6M
- 36.47%
- YTD
- 55.91%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- -15.72%
- 5Y*
- -22.11%
- 10Y*
- -16.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
KMI
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 18.01%
- 3Y*
- 28.06%
- 5Y*
- 19.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $379.13M | $306.76M | $325.97M | |
| $56.60M | $52.45M | $54.66M |
NWL vs. KMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 55.91% | -60.51% | 18.96% | -30.93% | -37.02% | 6.75% | 16.73% | 9.43% | -37.53% | -29.35% |
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 19.29% | 4.74% | 64.42% | 4.10% | 21.23% | 23.75% | -30.77% | 44.43% | -11.18% | -10.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWL and KMI is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2011 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NWL and KMI has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
NWL:
$2.38B
KMI:
$71.66B
NWL:
-$0.52
KMI:
$0.95
NWL:
0.33
KMI:
4.53
NWL:
$7.25B
KMI:
$11.85B
NWL:
$2.57B
KMI:
$5.16B
NWL:
$312.00M
KMI:
$5.61B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWL vs. KMI — Risk / Return Rank
NWL
KMI
NWL vs. KMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) and Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NWL | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.17 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 1.81 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.22 | 3.83 | -3.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NWL vs. KMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWL drawdown since its inception was -91.86%, which is greater than KMI's maximum drawdown of -72.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWL and KMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWL | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.86% | -72.70% | -19.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.33% | -10.08% | -41.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.28% | -18.40% | -53.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.96% | -20.31% | -65.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.86% | -55.13% | -36.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.52% | -6.21% | -78.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.99% | -31.84% | -3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.57% | 4.76% | +25.81% |
Volatility
NWL vs. KMI - Volatility Comparison
Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) has a higher volatility of 18.00% compared to Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) at 5.69%. This indicates that NWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWL | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.00% | 5.69% | +12.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.93% | 14.36% | +27.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.94% | 20.15% | +39.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.78% | 22.41% | +32.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.35% | 27.45% | +21.90% |
Dividends
NWL vs. KMI - Dividend Comparison
NWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than KMI's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 2.74% | 4.24% | 4.18% | 6.38% | 6.10% | 6.76% | 7.59% | 4.49% | 4.71% | 2.77% | 2.41% | 12.94% |
NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 5.00% | 7.53% | 2.81% | 5.07% | 7.03% | 4.21% | 4.33% | 4.79% | 4.95% | 2.85% | 1.70% | 1.72% |
Financials
NWL vs. KMI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newell Brands Inc. and Kinder Morgan, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NWL vs. KMI - Profitability Comparison
NWL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newell Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 812.00M and revenue of 1.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.
KMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a gross profit of -1.63B and revenue of -1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
NWL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newell Brands Inc. reported an operating income of 283.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.
KMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.44B and revenue of -1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 88.7%.
NWL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newell Brands Inc. reported a net income of 106.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
KMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a net income of -1.01B and revenue of -1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 62.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NWL and KMI have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NWL has higher volatility (18.00%) compared to KMI (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWL dropped -91.86% vs KMI's -72.70%.
KMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWL and KMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer