NWL vs. FAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NWL or FAT.
Performance
NWL vs. FAT - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWL achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly higher than FAT's -2.87% return.
NWL
5.99%
18.73%
16.08%
23.65%
-10.09%
-9.81%
FAT
-2.87%
8.13%
9.65%
0.45%
28.31%
N/A
Fundamentals
| NWL | FAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.68B | $89.77M |
| EPS | -$0.60 | -$9.22 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $7.71B | $143.83B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.57B | $46.70B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $568.00M | $26.08M |
Key characteristics
| NWL | FAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.40 | -0.00 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.28 | 0.34 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.06 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.31 | -0.00 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.71 | -0.01 |
| Ulcer Index | 15.44% | 31.87% |
| Daily Std Dev | 66.17% | 50.29% |
| Max Drawdown | -88.10% | -81.65% |
| Current Drawdown | -77.60% | -48.47% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between NWL and FAT is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NWL vs. FAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NWL vs. FAT - Dividend Comparison
NWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than FAT's 10.44% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 3.13% | 5.07% | 7.03% | 4.21% | 4.33% | 4.79% | 4.95% | 2.85% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.73% | 1.85% |
FAT FAT Brands Inc. | 10.44% | 9.24% | 10.92% | 4.91% | 0.00% | 6.37% | 18.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NWL vs. FAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWL drawdown since its inception was -88.10%, which is greater than FAT's maximum drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWL and FAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NWL vs. FAT - Volatility Comparison
Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) has a higher volatility of 23.09% compared to FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) at 7.08%. This indicates that NWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NWL vs. FAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newell Brands Inc. and FAT Brands Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities