PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWL vs. CHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NWL vs. CHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWL achieves a 40.04% return, which is significantly higher than CHD's 12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, NWL has underperformed CHD with an annualized return of -16.41%, while CHD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.


NWL

1D
2.24%
1M
40.95%
YTD
40.04%
6M
39.67%
1Y
-0.60%
3Y*
-9.59%
5Y*
-24.76%
10Y*
-16.41%

CHD

1D
-1.98%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
12.51%
6M
11.98%
1Y
-1.52%
3Y*
0.01%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWL vs. CHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWL
Newell Brands Inc.
40.04%-60.51%18.96%-30.93%-37.02%6.75%16.73%9.43%-37.53%-29.35%
CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
12.51%-18.91%11.96%18.72%-20.41%18.89%25.46%8.36%33.23%15.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NWL and CHD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 1986

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NWL:

$2.12B

CHD:

$22.32B

EPS

NWL:

-$0.67

CHD:

$3.02

PS Ratio

NWL:

0.29

CHD:

3.67

PB Ratio

NWL:

0.91

CHD:

5.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

NWL:

$7.19B

CHD:

$6.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NWL:

$2.44B

CHD:

$2.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

NWL:

$273.00M

CHD:

$1.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWL vs. CHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWL
NWL Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWL Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

CHD
CHD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWL vs. CHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NWLCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.01

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

-0.09

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.02

-0.16

+0.14

NWL vs. CHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWL Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is higher than the CHD Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWL and CHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NWL vs. CHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWL drawdown since its inception was -91.86%, which is greater than CHD's maximum drawdown of -51.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWL and CHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWLCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.86%

-51.52%

-40.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.33%

-17.18%

-34.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.28%

-27.28%

-45.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.42%

-31.72%

-54.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.86%

-31.72%

-60.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.10%

-15.84%

-70.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.86%

-12.01%

-22.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.58%

9.46%

+21.12%

Volatility

NWL vs. CHD - Volatility Comparison

Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) has a higher volatility of 20.11% compared to Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) at 6.95%. This indicates that NWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWLCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.11%

6.95%

+13.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.61%

16.00%

+21.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.51%

22.06%

+36.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.24%

20.67%

+33.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.04%

21.87%

+27.17%

Dividends

NWL vs. CHD - Dividend Comparison

NWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.57%, more than CHD's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
1.29%1.41%1.08%1.15%1.30%0.99%1.10%1.29%1.32%1.51%1.61%1.58%
NWL
Newell Brands Inc.
5.57%7.53%2.81%5.07%7.03%4.21%4.33%4.79%4.95%2.85%1.70%1.72%

Financials

NWL vs. CHD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newell Brands Inc. and Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
1.55B
1.47B
(NWL) Total Revenue
(CHD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NWL vs. CHD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Newell Brands Inc. and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
33.1%
46.4%
Portfolio components
NWL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Newell Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 513.00M and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.

CHD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 681.40M and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

NWL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Newell Brands Inc. reported an operating income of 34.00M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

CHD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 291.00M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.

NWL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Newell Brands Inc. reported a net income of -33.00M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.

CHD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a net income of 216.30M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NWL and CHD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWL has higher volatility (20.11%) compared to CHD (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWL dropped -91.86% vs CHD's -51.52%.

NWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWL and CHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer