NWL vs. CHD
NWL (Newell Brands Inc.) and CHD (Church & Dwight Co., Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, NWL returned -16.73%/yr vs 8.65%/yr for CHD. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NWL vs. CHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWL achieves a 55.91% return, which is significantly higher than CHD's 18.59% return. Over the past 10 years, NWL has underperformed CHD with an annualized return of -16.73%, while CHD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.65% annualized return.
NWL
- 1D
- 8.95%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- 6M
- 36.47%
- YTD
- 55.91%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- -15.72%
- 5Y*
- -22.11%
- 10Y*
- -16.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
CHD
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 2.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $191.62M | $175.25M | $190.70M | |
| $56.60M | $52.45M | $54.66M |
NWL vs. CHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 55.91% | -60.51% | 18.96% | -30.93% | -37.02% | 6.75% | 16.73% | 9.43% | -37.53% | -29.35% |
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 18.59% | -18.91% | 11.96% | 18.72% | -20.41% | 18.89% | 25.46% | 8.36% | 33.23% | 15.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWL and CHD is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 1986 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
NWL:
$2.38B
CHD:
$23.41B
NWL:
-$0.52
CHD:
$3.10
NWL:
0.33
CHD:
3.81
NWL:
0.98
CHD:
5.41
NWL:
$7.25B
CHD:
$6.23B
NWL:
$2.57B
CHD:
$2.84B
NWL:
$312.00M
CHD:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWL vs. CHD — Risk / Return Rank
NWL
CHD
NWL vs. CHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NWL | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.07 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 0.46 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.22 | 0.82 | -0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NWL vs. CHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWL drawdown since its inception was -91.86%, which is greater than CHD's maximum drawdown of -51.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWL and CHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWL | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.86% | -51.52% | -40.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.33% | -14.61% | -36.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.28% | -27.28% | -45.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.96% | -31.72% | -54.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.86% | -31.72% | -60.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.52% | -11.29% | -73.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.99% | -12.01% | -22.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.57% | 8.29% | +22.28% |
Volatility
NWL vs. CHD - Volatility Comparison
Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) has a higher volatility of 18.00% compared to Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) at 6.92%. This indicates that NWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWL | CHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.00% | 6.92% | +11.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.93% | 16.78% | +25.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.94% | 22.97% | +36.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.78% | 20.89% | +33.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.35% | 21.93% | +27.42% |
Dividends
NWL vs. CHD - Dividend Comparison
NWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than CHD's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 1.22% | 1.41% | 1.08% | 1.15% | 1.30% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.61% | 1.58% |
NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 5.00% | 7.53% | 2.81% | 5.07% | 7.03% | 4.21% | 4.33% | 4.79% | 4.95% | 2.85% | 1.70% | 1.72% |
Financials
NWL vs. CHD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newell Brands Inc. and Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NWL vs. CHD - Profitability Comparison
NWL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newell Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 812.00M and revenue of 1.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.
CHD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 693.90M and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.4%.
NWL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newell Brands Inc. reported an operating income of 283.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.
CHD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 276.40M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
NWL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newell Brands Inc. reported a net income of 106.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
CHD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a net income of 202.80M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NWL and CHD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NWL has higher volatility (18.00%) compared to CHD (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWL dropped -91.86% vs CHD's -51.52%.
CHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWL and CHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer