PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVTS vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVTS vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVTS achieves a 331.93% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 14.34% return.


NVTS

1D
19.26%
1M
93.72%
YTD
331.93%
6M
254.89%
1Y
419.19%
3Y*
51.10%
5Y*
25.44%
10Y*

AAPL

1D
-1.57%
1M
12.18%
YTD
14.34%
6M
9.39%
1Y
53.24%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
20.38%
10Y*
30.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVTS vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NVTS
Navitas Semiconductor Corporation
331.93%100.00%-55.76%129.91%-79.37%56.34%
AAPL
Apple Inc
14.34%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%25.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NVTS and AAPL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2021

0.35

The correlation between NVTS and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NVTS:

-$0.84

AAPL:

$8.24

PS Ratio

NVTS:

120.70

AAPL:

10.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVTS:

$40.50M

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVTS:

$7.44M

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVTS:

-$83.31M

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVTS vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVTS
NVTS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NVTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NVTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVTS vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVTSAAPLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.36

2.40

+0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.57

3.36

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.26

3.88

+3.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.93

9.76

+2.17

NVTS vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVTS Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVTS and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVTSAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36

2.40

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.75

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.44

-0.26

Drawdowns

NVTS vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVTS drawdown since its inception was -92.04%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVTS and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVTSAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.04%

-81.80%

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.25%

-13.80%

-44.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-85.18%

-33.36%

-51.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.04%

-33.36%

-58.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

-1.57%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.31%

-29.61%

-28.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.35%

5.47%

+29.88%

Volatility

NVTS vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) has a higher volatility of 49.41% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.46%. This indicates that NVTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVTSAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

49.41%

5.46%

+43.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.81%

15.91%

+73.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

125.88%

22.32%

+103.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.37%

27.46%

+93.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.40%

28.89%

+88.51%

Dividends

NVTS vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

NVTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
NVTS
Navitas Semiconductor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NVTS vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Navitas Semiconductor Corporation and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
8.60M
111.18B
(NVTS) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NVTS and AAPL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVTS has higher volatility (49.41%) compared to AAPL (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVTS dropped -92.04% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

NVTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVTS and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer