NVR vs. PHM
NVR (NVR, Inc.) and PHM (PulteGroup, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Residential Construction industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, NVR returned 13.55%/yr vs 21.52%/yr for PHM. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVR vs. PHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVR achieves a -16.09% return, which is significantly lower than PHM's 0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, NVR has underperformed PHM with an annualized return of 13.55%, while PHM has yielded a comparatively higher 21.52% annualized return.
NVR
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- -16.09%
- 6M
- -20.31%
- 1Y
- -13.43%
- 3Y*
- 2.33%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.55%
PHM
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- -9.69%
- 1Y
- 19.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 16.65%
- 10Y*
- 21.52%
NVR vs. PHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVR NVR, Inc. | -16.09% | -10.83% | 16.83% | 51.77% | -21.94% | 44.83% | 7.13% | 56.28% | -30.53% | 110.20% |
PHM PulteGroup, Inc. | 0.17% | 8.54% | 6.22% | 128.76% | -19.22% | 34.03% | 12.55% | 51.33% | -20.76% | 83.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVR and PHM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 1987 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, NVR and PHM have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
NVR:
$17.92B
PHM:
$22.72B
NVR:
$408.34
PHM:
$10.36
NVR:
14.99
PHM:
11.31
NVR:
1.46
PHM:
0.80
NVR:
1.92
PHM:
1.37
NVR:
5.13
PHM:
1.75
NVR:
$9.66B
PHM:
$16.83B
NVR:
$2.17B
PHM:
$4.39B
NVR:
$1.60B
PHM:
$2.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVR vs. PHM — Risk / Return Rank
NVR
PHM
NVR vs. PHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVR, Inc. (NVR) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVR | PHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.13 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.88 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 1.75 | -2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVR | PHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 0.58 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.48 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.59 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.26 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
NVR vs. PHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVR drawdown since its inception was -96.47%, roughly equal to the maximum PHM drawdown of -92.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVR and PHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVR | PHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.47% | -92.40% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.88% | -22.60% | -12.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.94% | -38.01% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.94% | -38.01% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.13% | -62.11% | +15.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.34% | -20.41% | -17.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -35.49% | +11.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.15% | 11.33% | +3.82% |
Volatility
NVR vs. PHM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NVR, Inc. (NVR) is 6.92%, while PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that NVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVR | PHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | 8.08% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 23.17% | -3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.24% | 33.98% | -6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.54% | 34.63% | -7.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.94% | 36.46% | -4.52% |
Dividends
NVR vs. PHM - Dividend Comparison
NVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVR NVR, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHM PulteGroup, Inc. | 0.82% | 0.78% | 0.75% | 0.66% | 1.34% | 1.00% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.96% | 1.85% |
Financials
NVR vs. PHM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVR, Inc. and PulteGroup, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NVR vs. PHM - Profitability Comparison
NVR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVR, Inc. reported a gross profit of 360.34M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.6%.
PHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of 822.11M and revenue of 3.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.
NVR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVR, Inc. reported an operating income of 203.37M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
PHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 441.77M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.
NVR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVR, Inc. reported a net income of 198.36M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
PHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 347.00M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NVR and PHM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHM has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to NVR (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVR dropped -96.47% vs PHM's -92.40%.
PHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVR and PHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer