NVR vs. PHM

In the year-to-date period, NVR achieves a 28.56% return, which is significantly higher than PHM's 24.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NVR having a 22.07% annualized return and PHM not far behind at 21.08%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVR, Inc. (NVR) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the PHM Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVR and PHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

The maximum NVR drawdown since its inception was -97.91%, which is greater than PHM's maximum drawdown of -92.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVR and PHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for NVR, Inc. (NVR) is 5.64%, while PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that NVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVR, Inc. and PulteGroup, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.