PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVMI vs. MSTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVMI vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nova Ltd (NVMI) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVMI achieves a 61.41% return, which is significantly higher than MSTR's -16.72% return. Over the past 10 years, NVMI has outperformed MSTR with an annualized return of 46.26%, while MSTR has yielded a comparatively lower 20.96% annualized return.


NVMI

1D
1.32%
1M
7.67%
YTD
61.41%
6M
64.32%
1Y
152.74%
3Y*
67.94%
5Y*
38.84%
10Y*
46.26%

MSTR

1D
-7.01%
1M
-31.15%
YTD
-16.72%
6M
-32.83%
1Y
-67.34%
3Y*
61.19%
5Y*
21.16%
10Y*
20.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVMI vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVMI
Nova Ltd
61.41%66.74%43.35%68.21%-44.25%107.51%86.62%66.07%-12.08%96.88%
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-16.72%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%

Correlation

The correlation between NVMI and MSTR is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2000

0.25

The correlation between NVMI and MSTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVMI:

$18.25B

MSTR:

$42.26B

EPS

NVMI:

$7.94

MSTR:

-$40.19

PS Ratio

NVMI:

19.50

MSTR:

79.33

PB Ratio

NVMI:

13.16

MSTR:

1.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVMI:

$902.53M

MSTR:

$490.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVMI:

$518.59M

MSTR:

$334.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

NVMI:

$293.89M

MSTR:

$466.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVMI vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVMI
NVMI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NVMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVMI Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NVMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVMI vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nova Ltd (NVMI) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVMIMSTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.81

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.13

-0.88

+8.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.29

-1.31

+20.60

NVMI vs. MSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the MSTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVMI and MSTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVMIMSTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

-0.96

+3.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.23

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

0.29

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.12

+0.09

Drawdowns

NVMI vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVMI drawdown since its inception was -98.22%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTR drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVMI and MSTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVMIMSTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.22%

-99.86%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.56%

-76.53%

+54.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.79%

-77.42%

+36.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.76%

-84.11%

+31.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.76%

-89.27%

+36.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-73.29%

+68.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.81%

-86.48%

+34.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.95%

51.59%

-43.64%

Volatility

NVMI vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison

Nova Ltd (NVMI) has a higher volatility of 22.17% compared to Strategy Inc (MSTR) at 19.43%. This indicates that NVMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVMIMSTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.17%

19.43%

+2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.24%

56.49%

-17.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.03%

70.30%

-18.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.05%

90.79%

-43.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.15%

73.70%

-30.55%

Dividends

NVMI vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither NVMI nor MSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NVMI vs. MSTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nova Ltd and Strategy Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
235.31M
124.30M
(NVMI) Total Revenue
(MSTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NVMI and MSTR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVMI has higher volatility (22.17%) compared to MSTR (19.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVMI dropped -98.22% vs MSTR's -99.86%.

NVMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVMI and MSTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer