PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDY vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDY vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDY achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 18.85% return.


NVDY

1D
1.27%
1M
7.84%
YTD
14.49%
6M
17.01%
1Y
47.85%
3Y*
55.07%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
-0.19%
1M
7.95%
YTD
18.85%
6M
18.67%
1Y
35.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDY vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
14.49%27.38%114.23%6.70%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
18.85%14.96%7.70%7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDY and QQQY is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.66

The correlation between NVDY and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDY vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDY vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDYQQQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.48

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.21

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

13.65

-4.44

NVDY vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDY and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDYQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.62

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

1.25

+0.41

Drawdowns

NVDY vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDY drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDY and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDYQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-19.05%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.81%

-11.14%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.47%

-0.55%

-4.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-2.91%

-3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.21%

2.61%

+2.60%

Volatility

NVDY vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a higher volatility of 9.43% compared to Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) at 4.14%. This indicates that NVDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDYQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.43%

4.14%

+5.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.71%

11.30%

+9.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.33%

13.66%

+13.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.22%

14.74%

+23.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.22%

14.74%

+23.48%

NVDY vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDY and QQQY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

NVDY vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

NVDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.14%, more than QQQY's 35.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
62.14%83.10%83.65%22.32%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
35.18%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDY and QQQY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDY has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to QQQY (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDY dropped -34.08% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, NVDY leads with 47.85% vs 35.59% for QQQY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 47.85% return vs 35.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDY and QQQY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 62.14%, compared with 35.18% for QQQY.

NVDY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Defiance.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDY and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer