NVDY vs. KLIP
NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) and KLIP (KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while KLIP is a Options Trading fund managed by CICC. Over the past 3 years, NVDY returned 50.61%/yr vs 5.90%/yr for KLIP. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KLIP.
Performance
NVDY vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDY achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -9.20% return.
NVDY
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 12.47%
- YTD
- 11.98%
- 1Y
- 25.25%
- 3Y*
- 50.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLIP
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -13.88%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 1Y
- -6.00%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDY vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 11.98% | 27.38% | 114.23% | 41.31% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | -9.20% | 16.92% | 3.37% | 16.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDY and KLIP is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDY vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank
NVDY
KLIP
NVDY vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDY | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.95 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | -0.28 | +2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | -0.69 | +4.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDY vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDY drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDY and KLIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDY | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.08% | -21.48% | -12.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.67% | -21.48% | +6.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.08% | -21.48% | -12.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -14.41% | +6.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -4.19% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 8.69% | -2.41% |
Volatility
NVDY vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 5.28%. This indicates that NVDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDY | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.29% | 5.28% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.11% | 13.01% | +9.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.77% | 16.58% | +12.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.00% | 18.10% | +19.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.00% | 18.10% | +19.90% |
NVDY vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDY vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison
NVDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 65.26%, more than KLIP's 28.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 28.38% | 25.14% | 54.26% | 61.22% |
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 65.26% | 83.10% | 83.65% | 22.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDY and KLIP have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDY has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to KLIP (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDY dropped -34.08% vs KLIP's -21.48%.
On 3-year performance, NVDY leads with 50.61% vs 5.90% for KLIP. On fees, KLIP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, KLIP has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 50.61% return vs 5.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KLIP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDY.
NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 65.26%, compared with 28.38% for KLIP.
NVDY is categorized as Derivative Income, while KLIP is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NVDY and 0.95% for KLIP.
NVDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDY and KLIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer