PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVD vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NVD vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NVD vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
5.59%-73.27%-93.09%-15.28%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
-1.78%17.08%21.81%8.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's -1.78% return.


NVD

1D
-11.38%
1M
0.27%
YTD
5.59%
6M
-2.50%
1Y
-75.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDVV

1D
2.35%
1M
-5.66%
YTD
-1.78%
6M
0.65%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NVD vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NVD vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVD
NVD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVD vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDFDVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.92

0.97

-1.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.62

1.41

-3.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.23

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

1.29

-2.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.02

5.68

-6.70

NVD vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVD Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVD and FDVV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.92

0.97

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.85

0.74

-1.59

Correlation

The correlation between NVD and FDVV is -0.46. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

NVD vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, more than FDVV's 3.00% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
11.20%11.83%8.68%15.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
3.00%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%

Drawdowns

NVD vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -98.85%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and FDVV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.85%

-40.25%

-58.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.54%

-12.34%

-72.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.58%

-7.04%

-91.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.48%

-3.85%

-76.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

73.89%

2.81%

+71.08%

Volatility

NVD vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 21.28% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 4.48%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NVDFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.28%

4.48%

+16.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.32%

7.68%

+44.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.56%

15.34%

+67.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.63%

14.74%

+78.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.63%

17.09%

+76.54%