NVD vs. COST

In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -38.47% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 12.17% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NVD Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVD and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.10%, more than COST's 0.47% yield.

The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 23.07% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 3.96%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.