PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUVL vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUVL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUVL achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 13.39% return.


NUVL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.19%
6M
20.48%
YTD
23.23%
1Y
59.41%
3Y*
42.16%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
47.35%

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.97%
6M
9.59%
YTD
13.39%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.44%
ALL TIME*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$103.52M$104.25M$110.17M

NUVL vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NUVL
Nuvalent, Inc.
23.23%28.50%6.37%147.11%56.41%5.19%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
13.39%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NUVL and DGRO is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2021

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUVL vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NUVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NUVL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUVLDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.61

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.76

14.07

-8.30

NUVL vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUVL Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUVL and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUVL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUVL drawdown since its inception was -80.70%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUVL and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUVLDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.70%

-35.10%

-45.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.98%

-6.47%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.12%

-14.03%

-33.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.70%

-19.31%

-61.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.35%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.67%

-3.41%

-21.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.84%

1.66%

+6.18%

Volatility

NUVL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) is 0.19%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that NUVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUVLDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

3.21%

-3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.33%

7.12%

+36.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.61%

9.61%

+48.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.08%

13.79%

+61.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.08%

16.58%

+58.50%

Dividends

NUVL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

NUVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.89%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
NUVL
Nuvalent, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUVL and DGRO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRO has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to NUVL (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUVL dropped -80.70% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUVL and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer