PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NURE vs. XLRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NURE vs. XLRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NURE achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly higher than XLRE's 12.35% return.


NURE

1D
0.84%
1M
4.01%
YTD
14.93%
6M
15.97%
1Y
10.47%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*

XLRE

1D
1.41%
1M
1.06%
YTD
12.35%
6M
12.83%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
6.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NURE vs. XLRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
14.93%-7.51%6.65%13.09%-28.48%53.41%-7.24%25.10%0.02%8.41%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
12.35%2.63%5.09%12.36%-26.25%46.10%-2.18%28.68%-2.39%10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NURE and XLRE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.82

The correlation between NURE and XLRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NURE vs. XLRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NURE
NURE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRE
XLRE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XLRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NURE vs. XLRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUREXLREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.13

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.18

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.39

3.23

-0.83

NURE vs. XLRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NURE Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the XLRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NURE and XLRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NURE vs. XLRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NURE drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, which is greater than XLRE's maximum drawdown of -38.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NURE and XLRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUREXLREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-38.83%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-8.33%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.03%

-16.74%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.98%

-34.12%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.39%

-0.72%

-8.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-9.56%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

3.04%

+1.34%

Volatility

NURE vs. XLRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) is 4.29%, while Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that NURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUREXLREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

5.35%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

10.63%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

14.17%

+1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

19.13%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

20.45%

+1.33%

NURE vs. XLRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NURE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRE's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

NURE vs. XLRE - Dividend Comparison

NURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than XLRE's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
4.33%4.56%3.51%3.73%2.80%1.34%3.41%3.28%4.11%3.86%0.48%0.00%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
3.15%3.45%3.43%3.31%3.70%2.61%3.15%3.06%3.78%3.25%4.22%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


NURE and XLRE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLRE has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to NURE (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NURE dropped -46.05% vs XLRE's -38.83%.

On 5-year performance, XLRE leads with 3.53% vs 1.78% for NURE. On fees, XLRE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, NURE has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLRE has performed better with a 3.53% return vs 1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLRE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NURE.

NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 3.15% for XLRE.

NURE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index, while XLRE tracks Real Estate Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NURE and 0.13% for XLRE.

XLRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NURE and XLRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer