NUMG vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
NUMG and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUMG is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. It was launched on Dec 13, 2016. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both NUMG and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NUMG or COWZ.
Correlation
The correlation between NUMG and COWZ is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
NUMG vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NUMG:
-0.27
COWZ:
-0.56
NUMG:
-0.23
COWZ:
-0.67
NUMG:
0.97
COWZ:
0.92
NUMG:
-0.21
COWZ:
-0.58
NUMG:
-0.83
COWZ:
-1.70
NUMG:
6.38%
COWZ:
5.03%
NUMG:
19.86%
COWZ:
15.33%
NUMG:
-38.85%
COWZ:
-38.63%
NUMG:
-21.61%
COWZ:
-14.78%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUMG achieves a -13.21% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's -7.82% return.
NUMG
-13.21%
-8.15%
-7.13%
-5.66%
11.44%
N/A
COWZ
-7.82%
-5.83%
-9.66%
-8.95%
22.64%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUMG vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUMG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NUMG vs. COWZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NUMG
COWZ
NUMG vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NUMG vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
NUMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than COWZ's 1.96% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 12.76% | 3.82% | 0.27% | 5.14% | 0.56% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.96% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
NUMG vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUMG drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, roughly equal to the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMG and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NUMG vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a higher volatility of 10.53% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 7.38%. This indicates that NUMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.