PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NUKZ vs. NOC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and NOC is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: -0.1

Performance

NUKZ vs. NOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
38.08%
6.89%
NUKZ
NOC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NUKZ:

0.25

NOC:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

NUKZ:

0.57

NOC:

0.69

Omega Ratio

NUKZ:

1.08

NOC:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

NUKZ:

0.27

NOC:

0.39

Martin Ratio

NUKZ:

0.97

NOC:

0.94

Ulcer Index

NUKZ:

9.11%

NOC:

8.55%

Daily Std Dev

NUKZ:

36.06%

NOC:

21.04%

Max Drawdown

NUKZ:

-32.67%

NOC:

-69.38%

Current Drawdown

NUKZ:

-32.67%

NOC:

-9.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a -15.27% return, which is significantly lower than NOC's 3.92% return.


NUKZ

YTD

-15.27%

1M

-13.88%

6M

-11.95%

1Y

8.92%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

NOC

YTD

3.92%

1M

-0.21%

6M

-8.75%

1Y

8.66%

5Y*

10.17%

10Y*

13.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NUKZ vs. NOC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NUKZ is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NUKZ is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NUKZ is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NUKZ is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NUKZ is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NUKZ is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NOC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOC is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOC is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOC is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOC is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOC is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOC is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NUKZ vs. NOC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NUKZ, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00
NUKZ: 0.25
NOC: 0.38
The chart of Sortino ratio for NUKZ, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
NUKZ: 0.57
NOC: 0.69
The chart of Omega ratio for NUKZ, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
NUKZ: 1.08
NOC: 1.09
The chart of Calmar ratio for NUKZ, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00
NUKZ: 0.27
NOC: 0.40
The chart of Martin ratio for NUKZ, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00
NUKZ: 0.97
NOC: 0.94

The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the NOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and NOC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00Feb 02Feb 09Feb 16Feb 23Mar 02Mar 09Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30
0.25
0.38
NUKZ
NOC

Dividends

NUKZ vs. NOC - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than NOC's 1.70% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.11%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.70%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%1.84%

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. NOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -32.67%, smaller than the maximum NOC drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and NOC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-32.67%
-9.95%
NUKZ
NOC

Volatility

NUKZ vs. NOC - Volatility Comparison

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 14.08% compared to Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) at 9.22%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.08%
9.22%
NUKZ
NOC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab