PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUKZ vs. AUEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NUKZ vs. AUEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NUKZ vs. AUEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
3.57%56.57%62.98%
AUEIX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund
0.79%6.95%11.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly higher than AUEIX's 0.79% return.


NUKZ

1D
3.64%
1M
-10.35%
YTD
3.57%
6M
2.03%
1Y
74.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AUEIX

1D
0.74%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
0.79%
6M
-1.36%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NUKZ vs. AUEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AUEIX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. AUEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ
NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AUEIX
AUEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AUEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AUEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKZ vs. AUEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUKZAUEIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

0.33

+2.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.02

0.54

+2.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.08

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

0.34

+4.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.46

1.55

+9.91

NUKZ vs. AUEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the AUEIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and AUEIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUKZAUEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

0.33

+2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.73

0.83

+0.90

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and AUEIX is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NUKZ vs. AUEIX - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than AUEIX's 22.52% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.88%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AUEIX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund
22.52%22.70%24.31%24.28%10.26%2.54%1.29%1.12%1.67%2.36%1.99%6.18%

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. AUEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, which is greater than AUEIX's maximum drawdown of -30.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and AUEIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NUKZAUEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.03%

-30.82%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.51%

-8.94%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.55%

-5.22%

-6.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-3.44%

-2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.25%

1.95%

+4.30%

Volatility

NUKZ vs. AUEIX - Volatility Comparison

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 10.20% compared to AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX) at 2.56%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NUKZAUEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.20%

2.56%

+7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

5.70%

+15.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.75%

12.05%

+19.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.60%

13.06%

+19.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.60%

15.21%

+17.39%